Dian Fu created FLINK-19566:
---
Summary: TableITCase.testCollectWithClose failed with
"IllegalStateException: MiniCluster is not yet running or has already been shut
down"
Key: FLINK-19566
URL:
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Hailong Wang
At 2020-10-10 17:06:07, "Jark Wu" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I would like to start the vote for FLIP-145 [1], which is discussed and
>reached consensus in the discussion thread [2].
>
>The vote will be open until 13th Oct. (72h), unless there is an objection
>or not
+1
> -原始邮件-
> 发件人: "Jark Wu"
> 发送时间: 2020-10-10 18:50:20 (星期六)
> 收件人: dev
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] FLIP-145: Support SQL windowing table-valued function
>
> +1
>
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 18:41, Benchao Li wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Jark Wu 于2020年10月10日周六 下午6:06写道：
> >
> > > Hi all,
>
+1, Thanks Jark for driving this.
Jark Wu 于2020年10月10日周六 下午6:50写道：
> +1
>
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 18:41, Benchao Li wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Jark Wu 于2020年10月10日周六 下午6:06写道：
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-145 [1], which is discussed and
> > > reached
+1
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 18:41, Benchao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> Jark Wu 于2020年10月10日周六 下午6:06写道：
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-145 [1], which is discussed and
> > reached consensus in the discussion thread [2].
> >
> > The vote will be open until 13th Oct. (72h),
+1
Jark Wu 于2020年10月10日周六 下午6:06写道：
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-145 [1], which is discussed and
> reached consensus in the discussion thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open until 13th Oct. (72h), unless there is an objection
> or not enough votes.
>
> Best,
> Jark
>
>
yardstrong created FLINK-19565:
--
Summary: java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableList to field
org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertex.operatorIDs of type
java.util.ArrayList in instance of org.apache.flink.runtime.jobgraph.JobVertex
Hi all,
I would like to start the vote for FLIP-145 [1], which is discussed and
reached consensus in the discussion thread [2].
The vote will be open until 13th Oct. (72h), unless there is an objection
or not enough votes.
Best,
Jark
[1]:
Hi everyone,
Thanks everyone for this healthy discussion. I think we have addressed all
the concerns. I would continue with a voting.
If you have any new objections, feel free to let me know.
Best,
Jark
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 17:54, Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi Jingsong,
>
> That's a good question. I
Hi Jingsong,
That's a good question. I did have searched a lot and didn't find any
system that provides such an out-of-box function.
I guess the reason is that in the traditional batch systems, this feature
is supported by the over window and they don't need to invent a
new function/syntax for
+1 for voting. Thanks Jark for driving.
+1 for TVF, It has been put forward by theory and supported by calcite. It
will greatly enhance the window related operations.
My personal feeling is that after TVF, the following operations can be
similar to the traditional batch SQL, as long as the
Jingsong Lee created FLINK-19564:
Summary: Parquet lack parquet-format-structures dependency
Key: FLINK-19564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19564
Project: Flink
Issue
Hi Pengcheng,
IIUC, the "stream operators" you mean is the non-time operators or called
regular operators, such as regular join, regular aggregate.
But you may misunderstand me, only the time operators can't be applied
after the new window operators, because of missing time attributes.
The
Hi Danny,
Thanks for the hint about named params syntax, I added examples with named
params in the FLIP.
Best,
Jark
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 15:03, Pengcheng Liu
wrote:
> Hi, Jark,
>
>I've got some different opinions there, I think it's a very common use
> case to use
>window operators
Zhengchao Shi created FLINK-19563:
-
Summary: database and table，two option can be combined into one
Key: FLINK-19563
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19563
Project: Flink
Zhengchao Shi created FLINK-19562:
-
Summary: the /flink/docs/docker/run.sh cause an error with numeric
username
Key: FLINK-19562
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-19562
Project: Flink
Hi, Jark,
I've got some different opinions there, I think it's a very common use
case to use
window operators in combination with streaming operators(even those time
operators).
(e.g. for some tables, users only care data within a period, but for
other tables, they may
want the whole
Thanks for driving this Jark ~
The FLIP overall looks good, i think the window TVFs would be the main "entry
point" syntax for our NTR use cases.
The syntax originated from the "One SQL To Rule Them All" paper and i think we
have reached an agreement.
I want to make some additions to the
Hi Jark,
Thanks for your reply, this makes sense to me.
The scenario I used above is just a case to explain what I'm concerned
about,
not necessarily a production use case. We can leave it to the future to see
whether
other users have these use cases.
Then I have no other concerns, +1 to start
19 matches
Mail list logo
