+1 (binding)
Best,
Lincoln Lee
Jingsong Li 于2023年6月13日周二 10:07写道：
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:25 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui Fan
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 19:58 liu ron wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (no-binding)
> > >
> > > Best,
>
+1 (binding)
Best,
Lincoln Lee
Jingsong Li 于2023年6月13日周二 10:07写道：
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:32 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Rui Fan
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 22:20 Benchao Li wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > yuxia
macdoor615 created FLINK-32321:
--
Summary: Temporal Join job missing condition after “ON”
Key: FLINK-32321
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32321
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Get your meaning now, thanks :)
Best,
Aitozi.
Feng Jin 于2023年6月13日周二 11:16写道：
> Hi Aitozi,
>
> Sorry for the confusing description.
>
> What I meant was that if we need to remind users about tire safety issues,
> we should introduce the new UDTF interface instead of executing the
> original
Hi Aitozi,
Sorry for the confusing description.
What I meant was that if we need to remind users about tire safety issues,
we should introduce the new UDTF interface instead of executing the
original UDTF asynchronously. Therefore, I agree with introducing the
AsyncTableFunction.
Best,
Feng
On
Hi Feng,
Thanks for your question. We do not provide a way to switch the UDTF
between sync and async way,
So there should be no thread safety problem here.
Best,
Aitozi
Feng Jin 于2023年6月13日周二 10:31写道：
> Hi Aitozi, We do need to remind users about thread safety issues. Thank you
> for your
Hi Aitozi, We do need to remind users about thread safety issues. Thank you
for your efforts on this FLIP. I have no further questions.
Best, Feng
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jing Ge wrote:
> Hi Aitozi,
>
> Thanks for taking care of that part. I have no other concern.
>
> Best regards,
>
Hi, Etienne.
Thanks for driving it.
I have one question about the mechanism of the cooldown timeout.
>From the Proposed Changes part, if a scalling event is received and it falls
>during the cooldown period, it'll be stacked to be executed after the period
>ends.
Also, from the description of
Aitozi created FLINK-32320:
--
Summary: Same correlate can not be reused due to the different
correlationId
Key: FLINK-32320
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32320
Project: Flink
+1
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:25 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Rui Fan
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 19:58 liu ron wrote:
>
> > +1 (no-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Ron
> >
> > Jing Ge 于2023年6月12日周一 19:33写道：
> >
> > > +1(binding) Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best
+1
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:32 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Rui Fan
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 22:20 Benchao Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > yuxia 于2023年6月12日周一 17:58写道：
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-311:
Hi everyone,
Thank you everyone for your valuable input. If there are no further
questions or concerns about the FLIP-295[1], I would like to start voting
tomorrow (6/14).
[1]
wgcn created FLINK-32319:
Summary: flink can't the partition of network after restart
Key: FLINK-32319
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32319
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hi Aitozi,
Thanks for taking care of that part. I have no other concern.
Best regards,
Jing
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 5:38 PM Aitozi wrote:
> BTW, If there are no other more blocking issue / comments, I would like to
> start a VOTE in another thread this wednesday 6.14
>
> Thanks,
> Aitozi.
>
>
> My main worry for doing this as a later iteration is that this would
> probably be a breaking change for the public interface. If that can be
> avoided and planned ahead, I'm fine with moving forward with how it is
> right now.
Make sense. Considering the public interfaces, I think we still
Luís Costa created FLINK-32318:
--
Summary: [flink-operator] missing s3 plugin in folder plugins
Key: FLINK-32318
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32318
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
Hi,
Thanks a lot for bringing up this topic and for the initial proposal. As more
and more people are looking into running Flink as a continuous service this
discussion is becoming very relevant.
What I would like to see is a clearer definition for what we understand by
stability and
Daren Wong created FLINK-32317:
--
Summary: Enrich metadata in CR error field
Key: FLINK-32317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32317
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
BTW, If there are no other more blocking issue / comments, I would like to
start a VOTE in another thread this wednesday 6.14
Thanks,
Aitozi.
Aitozi 于2023年6月12日周一 23:34写道：
> Hi, Jing,
> Thanks for your explanation. I get your point now.
>
> For the performance part, I think it's a good
Hi, Jing,
Thanks for your explanation. I get your point now.
For the performance part, I think it's a good idea to run with returning a
big table case, the memory consumption
should be a point to be taken care about. Because in the ordered mode, the
head element in buffer may affect the
total
Hi,
I’d like to start a discussion about FLIP-322 [1] which introduces a
cooldown period for the adaptive scheduler.
I'd like to get your feedback especially @Robert as you opened the
related ticket and worked on the reactive mode a lot.
[1]
+1 (binding)
Best,
Rui Fan
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 22:20 Benchao Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> yuxia 于2023年6月12日周一 17:58写道：
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-311: Support Call Stored
> > Procedure[1]. Based on the discussion [2], we have come to a consensus,
> so
>
+1 (binding)
Best,
Rui Fan
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 19:58 liu ron wrote:
> +1 (no-binding)
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
> Jing Ge 于2023年6月12日周一 19:33写道：
>
> > +1(binding) Thanks!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:01 PM yuxia
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > > Thanks
+1 (binding)
yuxia 于2023年6月12日周一 17:58写道：
> Hi everyone,
> Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-311: Support Call Stored
> Procedure[1]. Based on the discussion [2], we have come to a consensus, so
> I would like to start a vote.
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 15th,
Cai Liuyang created FLINK-32316:
---
Summary: Duplicated announceCombinedWatermark task maybe scheduled
if jobmanager failover
Key: FLINK-32316
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32316
Hi Yang,
Thanks a lot for your input!
It’s great that FLINK-28915 has covered the file download part. I’ve created
a ticket for the file upload part [1]. It's a prerequisite for supporting K8s
application
mode for SQL Gateway.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32315
Best,
Paul
Paul Lin created FLINK-32315:
Summary: Support local file upload in K8s mode
Key: FLINK-32315
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32315
Project: Flink
Issue Type: New Feature
Hi Aitozi,
Which key will be used for lookup is not an issue, only one row will be
required for each key in order to enrich it. True, it depends on the
implementation whether multiple rows or single row for each key will be
returned. However, for the lookup & enrichment scenario, one row/key is
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-32314:
Summary: Ignore class-loading errors after RPC system shutdown
Key: FLINK-32314
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32314
Project: Flink
+1 (no-binding)
Best,
Ron
Jing Ge 于2023年6月12日周一 19:33写道：
> +1(binding) Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:01 PM yuxia
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks Mang driving it.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Yuxia
> >
> > - 原始邮件 -
> > 发件人: "zhangmang1"
> > 收件人:
Martijn Visser created FLINK-32313:
--
Summary: CrateDB relies on flink-shaded in flink-connector-jdbc
Key: FLINK-32313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32313
Project: Flink
Sergey Nuyanzin created FLINK-32312:
---
Summary: SSLConnectionSocketFactory produced no output for 900
seconds
Key: FLINK-32312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32312
Project: Flink
+1(binding) Thanks!
Best regards,
Jing
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:01 PM yuxia wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks Mang driving it.
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人: "zhangmang1"
> 收件人: "dev"
> 发送时间: 星期一, 2023年 6 月 12日 下午 5:31:10
> 主题: [VOTE] FLIP-305: Support atomic for CREATE
Sergey Nuyanzin created FLINK-32311:
---
Summary:
ZooKeeperLeaderElectionTest.testZooKeeperReelectionWithReplacement and
DefaultLeaderElectionService.onGrantLeadership fell into dead lock
Key: FLINK-32311
URL:
Ran Tao created FLINK-32310:
---
Summary: Support enhanced show functions syntax
Key: FLINK-32310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32310
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
+1 (binding)
Thanks Mang driving it.
Best regards,
Yuxia
- 原始邮件 -
发件人: "zhangmang1"
收件人: "dev"
发送时间: 星期一, 2023年 6 月 12日 下午 5:31:10
主题: [VOTE] FLIP-305: Support atomic for CREATE TABLE AS SELECT(CTAS) statement
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-305: Support atomic
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-311: Support Call Stored Procedure[1].
Based on the discussion [2], we have come to a consensus, so I would like to
start a vote.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (until June 15th, 10:00AM GMT)
unless there is an objection or an
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the feedback about FLIP-305: Support atomic for CREATE TABLE AS
SELECT(CTAS) statement[1].
[2] is the discussion thread.
I'd like to start a vote for it. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(until June 15th, 10:00AM GMT) unless there is an objection or an
Fang Yong created FLINK-32309:
-
Summary: Shared classpaths and jars manager for jobs in sql
gateway cause confliction
Key: FLINK-32309
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32309
Project:
Spongebob created FLINK-32308:
-
Summary: RestClusterClient submit job to remote cluster
Key: FLINK-32308
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32308
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Gunnar Morling created FLINK-32307:
--
Summary: Incorrect docs for default behavior of
"scan.startup.mode" option
Key: FLINK-32307
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32307
Project: Flink
> If it’s the case, I’m good with introducing a new module and making SQL
Driver
> an internal class and accepts JSON plans only.
I rethink this again and again. I think it's better to move the SqlDriver
into the sql-gateway module because the sql client relies on the
sql-gateway to submit the
Hi, all.
FLIP-315 [1] has been accepted.
There are 5 binding votes, 1 non-binding votes:
- Jark Wu(binding)
- Jingsong Li (binding)
- Benchao Li (binding)
- Weijie Guo(binding)
- Jing Ge(binding)
- Aitozi (non-binding)
Thanks everyone.
[1]
43 matches
Mail list logo
