+1
Keeping the legacy implementation in place is confusing and encourages
adoption of something that really shouldn't be used.
Thanks for driving this,
David
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 8:45 AM Jing Ge wrote:
>
> Hi Wencong,
>
> Thanks for your clarification! +1
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Fri,
Thank you all for helping with the roadmap documentation.
I have merged the roadmap pull request.
Cheers,
Jark
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 15:26, Jing Ge wrote:
> Thanks Jark, +1 for the OLAP :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:04 PM Jark Wu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I
Hi Wencong,
Thanks for your clarification! +1
Best regards,
Jing
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 12:36 PM Wencong Liu wrote:
> Hi Jing,
>
>
> Thanks for your reply！
>
>
> > Or the "independent module extraction" mentioned in the FLIP does mean an
> independent module in Flink?
>
>
> Yes. If there are
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 3.0.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
*
Hi Jing,
Thanks for your reply！
> Or the "independent module extraction" mentioned in the FLIP does mean an
independent module in Flink?
Yes. If there are submodules in Flink repository needs the iteration (currently
not),
we could consider extracting them to a new submodule of Flink.
>
Hi Wencong,
Thanks for the proposal!
"The Iteration API in DataStream is planned be deprecated in Flink 1.19 and
then finally removed in Flink 2.0. For the users that rely on the Iteration
API in DataStream, they will have to migrate to Flink ML."
- Does it make sense to migrate the iteration
Thanks, +1 for this.
Best regards,
Weijie
Yangze Guo 于2023年9月1日周五 14:29写道：
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving this.
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Xintong Song wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Xintong
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:11 PM Dong Lin wrote:
Hi All,
I've analyzed through part of the pyflink code and found some improvement
possibilities.
I would like to hear voices on the idea.
Intention:
* upgrade several python related versions to eliminate end-of-life issues
and keep up with bugfixes
* start to add python arm64 support
Actual
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Yuepeng
At 2023-09-01 14:32:19, "Jark Wu" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>Best,
>Jark
>
>> 2023年8月30日 02:40，Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan 写道：
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Thank you all for your feedback on FLIP-356. I'd like to start a vote.
>>
>> Discussion thread:
>>
Thanks for the input. David is right: Beam is also utilizing the
accumulators [1]. In this sense you're right that this would require a more
wide-spread discussion whether other users would be affected as well. I
will give it a bit more thoughts.
[1]
+1 (binding)
Best,
Jark
> 2023年8月30日 02:40，Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan 写道：
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you all for your feedback on FLIP-356. I'd like to start a vote.
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/686bhgwrrb4xmbfzlk60szwxos4z64t7
> FLIP:
>
+1
Thanks for driving this.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 2:00 PM Xintong Song wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Best,
>
> Xintong
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:11 PM Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > Thanks Wencong for initiating the discussion.
> >
> > +1 for the proposal.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at
Jane Chan created FLINK-33015:
-
Summary: TableAggregateFunction codegen does not eval
emitUpdateWithRetract
Key: FLINK-33015
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33015
Project: Flink
+1
Best,
Xintong
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 1:11 PM Dong Lin wrote:
> Thanks Wencong for initiating the discussion.
>
> +1 for the proposal.
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 12:00 PM Wencong Liu wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-357: Deprecate Iteration API
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
