Hi all,
Thanks for all the feedback about the FLIP-334:
Decoupling autoscaler and kubernetes and
support the Standalone Autoscaler[1].
This FLIP was discussed in [2].
I'd like to start a vote for it. The vote will be open for at least 72
hours (until Sep 16th 11:00 UTC+8) unless there is an
+1 for the FLIP.
Another side thought is that in my experience, when users want to make
Flink TM use a specific hadoop/hive configuration, an easier way is to ship
the corresponding conf dir and set the env
variable via containerized.taskmanager.env.HADOOP_CONF_DIR.
Best,
Biao Geng
Archit Goyal
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Ron
ConradJam 于2023年9月12日周二 20:43写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Matt Wang 于2023年9月12日周二 19:29写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best,
> > Matt Wang
> >
> >
> > Replied Message
> > | From | Samrat Deb |
> > | Date | 09/12/2023 18:26 |
> > | To | |
>
Hi All,
If there are no further concerns about this FLIP, I will start a vote thread
tomorrow.
Thanks,
Archit Goyal
From: Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan
Date: Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 10:21 PM
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] FLIP-355: Add parent dir of files to classpath
Oscar Perez created FLINK-33078:
---
Summary: Enhance ParameterTool to support múltiple environments
Key: FLINK-33078
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33078
Project: Flink
Issue
Hi Zhanghao,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It is a good proposal to improve
data consistency.
Speaking of naming conventions of choosing location over host, how about
"endpoint" with the following thoughts:
1. endpoint is a more professional word than location in the network
Hi Dev,
Currently Flink 1.17 is using flink-shaded 16.1 and Flink 1.18 is using
flink-shaded 17.0. Do we need to consider any compatibility rules between
them? E.g. is there any concern to upgrade flink-shaded from 16.1 to 17.x
for Flink 1.17? Or there are some implicit dependency rules between
Hi Ferenc:
What's the ETA of the Flink 1.18? I think we should beable to collaborate on
this，and at work we are using Flink too.
On 2023/09/12 15:16:11 Ferenc Csaky wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up! Cca half a year ago I started to work on an Akka
> Artery migration, there
Thank you all for the questions/suggestions!
After some questions/clarifications there are only +1 on the discussion.
Unless there are further questions/objections I'm intended to merge the
related PR in 24 hours: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23359
G
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 10:53 AM
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for bringing this up! Cca half a year ago I started to work on an Akka
Artery migration, there is a draft PR for that [1]. It might be an option to
revive that work and point it against Pekko instead. Although I would highlight
FLINK-29281 [2] which will replace the whole
The netty maintenance asked akka team to migrate once back in 2012, but they
never have a chance to do that, and the multi node testkit has been upgraded to
Netty 4 ,only the classic transport is based on Netty 3.
In later version of Akka 2.8, they removed the classic transport too.
I think
Stefan Richter created FLINK-33077:
--
Summary: Minimize the risk of hard back-pressure with buffer
debloating enabled
Key: FLINK-33077
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33077
Project:
+1 (non-binding)
Matt Wang 于2023年9月12日周二 19:29写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Matt Wang
>
>
> Replied Message
> | From | Samrat Deb |
> | Date | 09/12/2023 18:26 |
> | To | |
> | Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-323: Support Attached Execution on Flink
> Application Completion
Weijie Guo created FLINK-33076:
--
Summary: broadcastEmit of ChannelSelectorRecordWriter should reuse
the serialized record
Key: FLINK-33076
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33076
Project:
+1 (non-binding)
--
Best,
Matt Wang
Replied Message
| From | Samrat Deb |
| Date | 09/12/2023 18:26 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-323: Support Attached Execution on Flink
Application Completion for Batch Jobs |
Thank you for driving this FLIP,
+1 (non-binding)
Bests,
Hi Becket,
Thanks for your reply with details.
> 2. I agree it would be too verbose to annotate every internal method /
> class / interface. Currently we already treat the methods / interfaces /
> classes without annotations as effectively @Internal.
>
Does it make sense to clearly define that
Thank you for driving this FLIP,
+1 (non-binding)
Bests,
Samrat
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:27 PM Ahmed Hamdy wrote:
> Hi Allison
> Thanks for the proposal.
> + (non-binding)
> Best Regards
> Ahmed Hamdy
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 03:48, Weihua Hu wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> >
Hi everyone,
Please review [1] and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
3.3.0 of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
**Release Overview**
As an overview, the release consists
Hi Allison
Thanks for the proposal.
+ (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 03:48, Weihua Hu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Weihua
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:16 AM Jing Ge
> wrote:
>
> > +1(binding)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
There are 7 approving votes, 3 of which are binding:
* Ahmed (non-binding)
* Sergey (non-binding)
* Samrat (non-binding)
* Ferenc (non-binding)
* Danny (binding)
* Leonard (binding)
* Dong (binding)
There are no disapproving
Hi everyone,
The vote is now closed, and I'll open a separate result thread.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:25 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified that the source release can be built successfully.
> - Verified that the checksum and gpg files match the
It's come to my attention that Flink is using Pekko's classical remoting,
if this is the case then I would recommend making a response at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/19h2wrs2om91g5vhnftv583fo0ddfshm .
Quick summary of what is being discussed is what to do with Pekko's
classical remoting.
+1 (binding)
- Verified that the source release can be built successfully.
- Verified that the checksum and gpg files match the corresponding source
release files and maven artifacts.
- Verified that the source archives do not contain any binary file.
- Checked that the source code tag looks
Hi Jark,
Please see my comments inline.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:41 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Hi Dong,
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> > As a result, the proposed job-level
> > config will be applied only in the changelog stage. So there is no
> > difference between these two approaches in
Martijn Visser created FLINK-33075:
--
Summary: Notice files for Statefun are outdated
Key: FLINK-33075
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33075
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hey Danny,
Thanks for this. Cancelling the RC and fixing the issues.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:34 PM Danny Cranmer
wrote:
> Hey Martijn, thanks for driving this.
>
> -1 (binding) due to the concerns highlighted below
>
> - NOTICE files are present
> - Note: The
+1 (binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked release notes
- reviewed the web PR
Best,
Leonard
> On Sep 11, 2023, at 7:01 PM, Danny Cranmer wrote:
>
> Hey Martijn, thanks for picking this up.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Release notes look
Sergey Nuyanzin created FLINK-33074:
---
Summary: Flink-ci-mirror stopped running for commits after 3rd of
Septemper
Key: FLINK-33074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33074
Project:
28 matches
Mail list logo
