lifengchao created FLINK-33963:
--
Summary: There is only one UDF instance after serializing the same
task
Key: FLINK-33963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33963
Project: Flink
Zhanghao Chen created FLINK-33962:
-
Summary: Chaining-agnostic OperatorID generation for improved
state compatibility on parallelism change
Key: FLINK-33962
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33962
Thanks for driving this, Xiangyu!
+1 for the overall proposal. I believe this will enhance the
availability and competitiveness of Flink in OLAP scenarios.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 4:51 PM xiangyu feng wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> I'm opening this thread to discuss FLIP-407: Improve
+1(binding)
Best regards,
Weijie
Zhu Zhu 于2023年12月27日周三 18:54写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> Zhanghao Chen 于2023年12月27日周三 15:41写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhanghao Chen
> >
> > From: Yong Fang
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2023
Hi all,
Thank you for all your comments! The FLIP has been updated
accordingly. Please let me know if you have any further questions or
comments.
Also, note that many people are on Christmas break, so we will keep
the discussion open for another week.
Best,
Xuannan
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 5:20
Hi Zakelly,
I'm not sure whether we could add the state backend type in the
new key name of state.backend.incremental. It means we use
`execution.checkpointing.rocksdb-incremental` or
`execution.checkpointing.rocksdb-incremental.enabled`.
So far, state.backend.incremental only works for rocksdb
Jiang Xin created FLINK-33961:
-
Summary: Hybrid Shuffle may hang when exclusive buffers per
channel is set to 0
Key: FLINK-33961
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33961
Project: Flink
Hi Xiangyu,
The proposed new options are targeted on experienced Flink platform
administrators instead of normal end users, and a one-by-one mapping from
non-default option to the default option variant might be easier for users to
understand. Also, although JM and TM tend to use the same set
Hi, Martijn.
Thank you for your reminder :)
My idea is that in the current 1.x version, we can automatically convert the
agg operator in the old grammar into the agg operator
in the new grammar. Huge changes will be introduced in version 2.0 that old
syntax will be directly deleted at the code
Hi, Martijn
Thank you for your input. I align with your viewpoint and am fully on board
with the idea. I'll continue contributing and provide assistance wherever
possible.
Best regards,
Jinsui
Martijn Visser 于2023年12月27日周三 23:56写道：
> Hi Jinsui,
>
> Thanks for opening the discussion and
Hey,
Gordon, apologies for the delay. Yes this is the correct understanding, all
connectors follow a similar pattern.
Would appreciate some PMC eyes on this release.
Thanks,
Danny
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, 23:28 Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai, wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> Thanks for starting a RC for this.
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
