+1
Best,
Kurt
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:25 AM Seth Wiesman wrote:
> +1
>
> I would hope this helps attract more early adopters so if there are issues
> we can resolve them in time for 1.13.
>
> Seth
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:13 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given that
+1
I would hope this helps attract more early adopters so if there are issues
we can resolve them in time for 1.13.
Seth
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:13 AM Dawid Wysakowicz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given that the BATCH execution mode was only released in 1.12 and a
> rather small impact of the suggested
Hi,
Given that the BATCH execution mode was only released in 1.12 and a
rather small impact of the suggested change I'd be ok with backporting
it to 1.12.x.
Best,
Dawid
On 07/01/2021 12:50, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> +1 on my side as it does not break anything and it can act as motivation
> for
+1 on my side as it does not break anything and it can act as motivation
for some people to upgrade.
Cheers,
Kostas
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, 12:39 Aljoscha Krettek, wrote:
> 1.12.x
> Reply-To:
>
> Hi,
>
> what do you think about backporting FLINK-20491 [1] to Flink 1.12.x?
>
> I (we, including
1.12.x
Reply-To:
Hi,
what do you think about backporting FLINK-20491 [1] to Flink 1.12.x?
I (we, including Dawid and Kostas) are a bit torn on this.
a) It's a limitation of Flink 1.12.0 and fixing this seems very good for
users that would otherwise have to wait until Flink 1.13.0.
b) It's
