There could be a problem with the fat image actually depending on the
slim version; I'm not sure if the official-images repo supports that.
We should however be able to generate 2 separate standalone dockerfiles.
On 23/12/2021 11:16, Till Rohrmann wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for starting this
Hi David,
Thanks for starting this discussion. I like the idea of providing smaller
images that can be used by more advanced users that don't need everything.
Having smaller image sizes can be really helpful when having to pull the
image (with your changes this time should roughly be decreased by
Hi,
I did some quick prototyping on the slimmed down docker images, and I was
able to cut the docker image size by ~40% with a minimum effort [1] (using
a multi-stage build + trimming examples / opt + using slimmed down JRE
image).
I think this might be a low hanging fruit for reducing MTTR in
