Thanks for the feedback Piotr.
If there's no other feedback, voting will start in a couple of days.
Efrat
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 at 11:15, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
> Hi Efrat,
>
> Thanks for the proposal and +1 from my side for this FLIP.
>
> Flink currently has a huge observability gap when it comes t
Hi Efrat,
Thanks for the proposal and +1 from my side for this FLIP.
Flink currently has a huge observability gap when it comes to the state of
the per-split watermarks,
which makes it very difficult for users to understand why any given job
generated any particular
operator-level watermark. Prov
Hey everyone!
I'd like to propose adding a few watermark related metrics for better
visibility on split level watermark alignment and idleness states
In addition to per-split watermark, I want to export the split state
(active, idle and paused) timers, same as taskIO
busy/idle/backpressured time re
