Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

I agree, it's useful for pull requests, but in the master it easily leads to multiple commits in a row not being tests. Most recent builds are marked as failed because they were canceled... On 07.06.2017 18:41, Robert Metzger wrote: I think auto cancellation is also enabled for branch builds.

Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

I think auto cancellation is also enabled for branch builds. I think this is pretty bad to find out which commit introduced a build instability. I'll contact INFRA to check this again. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Greg Hogan wrote: > Wow, that was a quick response that

Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

Wow, that was a quick response that this feature was already enabled. > On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Greg Hogan wrote: > > Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13778 > > > >> On Mar 29, 2017, at 4:07 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13778 > On Mar 29, 2017, at 4:07 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > > Looking at Flink's Travis account, I've got the feeling that this feature > has already been activated.

Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

Looking at Flink's Travis account, I've got the feeling that this feature has already been activated. At least I see some builds (e.g. PR #3625) where multiple commits where created in a short time and then only the latest was actually executed. Apart from that I think it's a good idea since it

Re: [DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

+1 to Greg's suggestion. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Greg Hogan wrote: > Hi, > > Just saw this TravisCI beta feature. I think this would be worthwhile to > enable on pull request builds. We could leave branch builds unchanged since > there are fewer builds of this type

[DISCUSS] TravisCI auto cancellation

Hi, Just saw this TravisCI beta feature. I think this would be worthwhile to enable on pull request builds. We could leave branch builds unchanged since there are fewer builds of this type and skipping builds would make it harder to locate a broken build. It’s not uncommon to see three or more