Hi all,
Thanks Dian and all of your feedback! I have bring up the VOTE thread for
the first RC [1].
I would appreciate if you could check it.
Best,
Jincheng
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4b43a94db6731de4d450cee828ac2effd5a47bb8a8374e31af79b08a%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
dianfu
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks for the proposal. I think this is a good idea. Usually Python users will
firstly try to install a Python package from PyPI when they are trying it out.
This would definitely benefit Python users.
Regards,
Dian
> 在 2020年2月5日，上午8:56，jincheng sun 写道：
>
> I see, thanks for
Thanks everyone for your positive feedback, I will continue to push forward
the subsequent release process.
Best, Jincheng
jincheng sun 于2020年2月5日周三 上午8:56写道：
> I see, thanks for the confirmation Aljoscha!
>
> Best,
> Jincheng
>
>
>
> Aljoscha Krettek 于2020年2月4日周二 下午9:58写道：
>
>> Yes, as I
I see, thanks for the confirmation Aljoscha!
Best,
Jincheng
Aljoscha Krettek 于2020年2月4日周二 下午9:58写道：
> Yes, as I said I think it's still good to release.
>
> On 04.02.20 13:49, jincheng sun wrote:
> > Hi Aljoscha,
> >
> > I agree that the coming PyFlink package of 1.10 is enough for users who
Yes, as I said I think it's still good to release.
On 04.02.20 13:49, jincheng sun wrote:
Hi Aljoscha,
I agree that the coming PyFlink package of 1.10 is enough for users who
just want to try out the latest version of PyFlink. However, I think that
there are also cases where the old versions
Hi Aljoscha,
I agree that the coming PyFlink package of 1.10 is enough for users who
just want to try out the latest version of PyFlink. However, I think that
there are also cases where the old versions are useful. Usually users tend
to prepare their development environment according to the
Hi,
I think that's a good idea, but we will also soon have Flink 1.10 anyways.
Best,
Aljoscha
On 04.02.20 07:25, Hequn Cheng wrote:
Hi Jincheng,
+1 for this proposal.
From the perspective of users, I think it would nice to have PyFlink on
PyPI which makes it much easier to install PyFlink.
Hi Jincheng,
+1 for this proposal.
>From the perspective of users, I think it would nice to have PyFlink on
PyPI which makes it much easier to install PyFlink.
Best, Hequn
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:09 PM Jeff Zhang wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Xingbo Huang 于2020年2月4日周二 下午1:07写道：
>
>> Hi Jincheng,
>>
>>
+1
Xingbo Huang 于2020年2月4日周二 下午1:07写道：
> Hi Jincheng,
>
> Thanks for driving this.
> +1 for this proposal.
>
> Compared to building from source, downloading directly from PyPI will
> greatly save the development cost of Python users.
>
> Best,
> Xingbo
>
>
>
> Wei Zhong 于2020年2月4日周二
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks for driving this.
+1 for this proposal.
Compared to building from source, downloading directly from PyPI will
greatly save the development cost of Python users.
Best,
Xingbo
Wei Zhong 于2020年2月4日周二 下午12:43写道：
> Hi Jincheng,
>
> Thanks for bring up this discussion!
>
> +1
Hi Jincheng,
Thanks for bring up this discussion!
+1 for this proposal. Building from source takes long time and requires a
good network environment. Some users may not have such an environment.
Uploading to PyPI will greatly improve the user experience.
Best,
Wei
jincheng sun 于2020年2月4日周二
Hi folks,
I am very happy to receive some user inquiries about the use of Flink
Python API (PyFlink) recently. One of the more common questions is whether
it is possible to install PyFlink without using source code build. The most
convenient and natural way for users is to use `pip install
12 matches
Mail list logo
