+1
Best,
Ron
Jing Ge 于2023年7月26日周三 23:39写道：
> +1(binding).
>
> Theoretically, I agree with Matthias. But in the practices, afaic, those
> touched classes are low level APIs. We'd better have enough time to
> evaluate them with care. More time might be needed than we could have
> before the
+1(binding).
Theoretically, I agree with Matthias. But in the practices, afaic, those
touched classes are low level APIs. We'd better have enough time to
evaluate them with care. More time might be needed than we could have
before the 1.18 release. A follow-up ticket might solve the concern.
-0 (binding)
I'm not going to block this effort because it's still possible to cover
other occurrences in a subsequent FLIP if it's considered useful (I'm not
in the position to judge how important the IOReadableWritable interface is
in the context of removing the DataSet API).
The recent
+1 (binding)
Best regards,
Weijie
Yuxin Tan 于2023年7月26日周三 16:11写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Yuxin
>
>
> Xintong Song 于2023年7月26日周三 16:09写道：
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Xintong
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM Wencong Liu
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi dev,
> > >
>
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Yuxin
Xintong Song 于2023年7月26日周三 16:09写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
>
> Xintong
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM Wencong Liu wrote:
>
> > Hi dev,
> >
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-347.
> >
> >
> > Discussion thread:
> >
+1 (binding)
Best,
Xintong
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM Wencong Liu wrote:
> Hi dev,
>
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-347.
>
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/3gcxhnqpsvb85golnlxf9tv5p43xkjgj
> FLIP:
>
Hi dev,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-347.
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/3gcxhnqpsvb85golnlxf9tv5p43xkjgj
FLIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-347%3A+Remove+IOReadableWritable+serialization+in+Path
Best regards,
Wencong Liu
