Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-02 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
This RC is officially cancelled. Please visit the vote thread for the new RC6: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Flink-Stateful-Functions-Release-2-0-0-release-candidate-6-td39776.html On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Thanks e

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-02 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
Thanks everyone, all issues mentioned above are now resolved. I'll proceed to create a new RC now. On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:36 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Good catch @Dian, > that was because we changed some dependencies in > statefun-flink-distribution to provided scope from the previous

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
Good catch @Dian, that was because we changed some dependencies in statefun-flink-distribution to provided scope from the previous RC, but did not remove the NOTICE entries. Would be good to fix that as well in the next RC. On Thu, Apr 2, 2020, 10:03 AM Dian Fu wrote: > Another issue: https://i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Dian Fu
Another issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16932 The following packages which are declared in the NOTICE to be bundled in the jar of statefun-flink-distribution are not actually bundled in it: - org.apache.commons:commons-math3:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
-1 Another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16927 This is a problem in Flink 1.10.0, but can be addressed in StateFun and unblock the 2.0.0 release by using the legacy scheduler for now, as long as StateFun depends on Flink 1.10.0. We'll have to cancel this RC, in favor of a ne

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Igal Shilman
-1 (non binding) Unfortunately we have found a blocker, we are hitting [1]. The side effect of this issue is that it is not possible to configure the execution environment via setting configuration options in flink-conf.yaml. This is the main way checkpointing, for example, is expected to be config

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Stephan Ewen
+1 (binding) - built from source (mvn clean install) - ran all tests successfully - built and checked the docs (WSL / Docker setup) - checked contents of the produced jars - checked license / notice files of source distribution - checked license of "statefun-flink-distribution" - con

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
As a gentle reminder, please do note that I'm proposing a shorter voting period for this RC, ending *Thursday, April 2nd, UTC 06:00 (~24 hours from now).*Please let me know if you have objections with this. On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 5:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please revi

[VOTE] Apache Flink Stateful Functions Release 2.0.0, release candidate #5

2020-04-01 Thread Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the *release candidate #5* for the version 2.0.0 of Apache Flink Stateful Functions, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) **Testing Guideline** You can find here [1] a doc that we can