he proposed changes in this FLIP do not break
> > the previous truth by introducing the `attemptNumber` in
> > `ExecutionAttemptID`, so we do not need to further consider this issue
> now.
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Best,
> > Zhijiang
> >
> &g
sider this issue now.
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> Best,
> Zhijiang
>
>
> --
> From:Till Rohrmann
> Send Time:2020 Apr. 16 (Thu.) 21:39
> To:dev
> Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-118: Improve Flink’s ID system
>
> Thanks for creating this FLIP, Yangze.
`ExecutionAttemptID`, so
we do not need to further consider this issue now.
+1 (binding).
Best,
Zhijiang
--
From:Till Rohrmann
Send Time:2020 Apr. 16 (Thu.) 21:39
To:dev
Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-118: Improve Flink’s ID system
Thanks
Thanks for creating this FLIP, Yangze.
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Till
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:51 AM Yangze Guo wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start the vote of FLIP-118 [1], which improves the log
> readability by adding more information to Flink’s IDs. This FLIP is
> discussed in the th
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start the vote of FLIP-118 [1], which improves the log
readability by adding more information to Flink’s IDs. This FLIP is
discussed in the thread[2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there is an objection,
I will try to close it by April 21, 2020 10:00
