[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-04 Thread Leonard Xu
Hi all, The voting time for FLIP-162 has passed. I'm closing the vote now. There were 4 +1 votes, 4 of which are binding: - Jark (binding) - Timo (binding) - Kurt (binding) - Jingsong (binding) There were no -1 votes, thus, FLIP-162 has been accepted. Thanks everyone! Best, Leonard

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-03 Thread Jingsong Li
+1 Thanks Leonard for driving this topic. Best, Jingsong On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:44 PM Kurt Young wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:43 PM Timo Walther wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards, > > Timo > > > > On 03.03.21 04:14, Jark Wu wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-03 Thread Kurt Young
+1 (binding) Best, Kurt On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:43 PM Timo Walther wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Timo > > On 03.03.21 04:14, Jark Wu wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Jark > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Leonard Xu wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I would like to start

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-02 Thread Timo Walther
+1 (binding) Regards, Timo On 03.03.21 04:14, Jark Wu wrote: +1 (binding) Best, Jark On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Leonard Xu wrote: Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-162 [1], which has been discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. Please vote +1 to

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-02 Thread Jark Wu
+1 (binding) Best, Jark On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 10:42, Leonard Xu wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-162 [1], which has been discussed > and > reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. > > The vote

[VOTE] FLIP-162: Consistent Flink SQL time function behavior

2021-03-01 Thread Leonard Xu
Hi all, I would like to start the vote for FLIP-162 [1], which has been discussed and reached a consensus in the discussion thread [2]. Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote will be open until March 5th (72h), unless there is an objection or not enough votes.