Thanks for participating in this vote. @Xintong you didn't miss the FLIP
discussion [1]. :)
Anyway, I'm closing this vote thread. The results will be announced in a
separate message.
Matthias
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/t540zg3j3womyjcrwrvkwp9p4vfps6t4
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 6:33 AM
+1 (binding)
I guess I missed the FLIP discussion. But the FLIP LGTM. Thanks for driving
this, Matthias.
Best,
Xintong
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:33 PM Jing Ge wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:12 PM Zhu Zhu wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
>
+1(binding)
Thanks.
Best regards,
Jing
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:12 PM Zhu Zhu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> Matthias Pohl 于2023年12月12日周二 01:32写道：
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-335 [1]. It covers the deprecation (and
> > Flink 2.0-related removal) of
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Zhu
Matthias Pohl 于2023年12月12日周二 01:32写道：
> Hi everyone,
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-335 [1]. It covers the deprecation (and
> Flink 2.0-related removal) of Flink's Time classes in favor of Java's
> Duration class.
>
> The related discussion thread can be found in
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-335 [1]. It covers the deprecation (and
Flink 2.0-related removal) of Flink's Time classes in favor of Java's
Duration class.
The related discussion thread can be found in [2].
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours and only concluded if
