[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-22 Thread Joao Boto
Hi, I am happy to say that FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1] has been accepted. The proposal has been accepted with 7 approving votes (3 binding) and there are no disapproval (voted on this thread [2]): Ahmed Hamdy (non-binding) Aleksandr Pilipenko (non-binding) Jeyhun Karimov

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-21 Thread Leonard Xu
+1(binding), thanks Joao Boto for driving this FLIP. Best, Leonard > 2024年5月17日 下午4:34，Ahmed Hamdy 写道： > > Hi all, > +1 (non-binding) > Best Regards > Ahmed Hamdy > > > On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 02:13, Jiabao Sun wrote: > >> Thanks for driving this proposal! >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Best, >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-17 Thread Ahmed Hamdy
Hi all, +1 (non-binding) Best Regards Ahmed Hamdy On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 02:13, Jiabao Sun wrote: > Thanks for driving this proposal! > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Jiabao > > > On 2024/05/10 22:18:04 Jeyhun Karimov wrote: > > Thanks for driving this! > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Regards, > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-16 Thread Jiabao Sun
Thanks for driving this proposal! +1 (binding) Best, Jiabao On 2024/05/10 22:18:04 Jeyhun Karimov wrote: > Thanks for driving this! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Jeyhun > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:50 PM Muhammet Orazov > wrote: > > > Thanks João for your efforts and driving this!

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-16 Thread João Boto
Hmm sorry, I will try to search consensus.. I read 3 Votes but miss the binding part.. On 2024/05/16 01:36:46 Rui Fan wrote: > Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding) > votes according to Flink Bylaws[1] before the community accepts it. > > You can search "Consensus" and

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-16 Thread lorenzo . affetti
Well, I give my +1 (non-binding), but we need more binding votes :) Looking forward to see this approved and see the changes. On May 16, 2024 at 03:37 +0200, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com>, wrote: > Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding) > votes according to Flink Bylaws[1] b

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-15 Thread Rui Fan
Thanks Joao Boto for driving the FLIP. We need 3 +1(binding) votes according to Flink Bylaws[1] before the community accepts it. You can search "Consensus" and "FLIP (Major Change)" keywords in this wiki. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Bylaws Best, Rui On Thu, May 1

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-15 Thread Joao Boto
Hi, I am happy to say that FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1] has been accepted. The proposal has been accepted with 5 approving votes (1 binding) and there are no disapproval (voted on this thread [2]): Rui Fan (binding) Yuepeng Pan (non-binding) Aleksandr Pilipenko (non-bindin

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-10 Thread Jeyhun Karimov
Thanks for driving this! +1 (non-binding) Regards, Jeyhun On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:50 PM Muhammet Orazov wrote: > Thanks João for your efforts and driving this! > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Muhammet > > On 2024-05-09 12:01, Joao Boto wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks for all the fee

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-10 Thread Muhammet Orazov
Thanks João for your efforts and driving this! +1 (non-binding) Best, Muhammet On 2024-05-09 12:01, Joao Boto wrote: Hi everyone, Thanks for all the feedback, I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. The vote wil

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-10 Thread Aleksandr Pilipenko
Thanks for driving this! +1 (non-binding) Thanks, Aleksandr On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 10:58, Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for driving this proposal! > > +1(binding) > > Best, > Rui > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 9:50 AM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > > > Hi, Boto. > > > > +1 (non-binding). >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-10 Thread Rui Fan
Thanks for driving this proposal! +1(binding) Best, Rui On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 9:50 AM Yuepeng Pan wrote: > Hi, Boto. > > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks for your driving it. > > Best regards, > Yuepeng Pan. > > On 2024/05/09 12:01:04 Joao Boto wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks for all the

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-09 Thread Yuepeng Pan
Hi, Boto. +1 (non-binding). Thanks for your driving it. Best regards, Yuepeng Pan. On 2024/05/09 12:01:04 Joao Boto wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for all the feedback, I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-449: > Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1]. > The discussion thread is here [2]

[VOTE] FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc

2024-05-09 Thread Joao Boto
Hi everyone, Thanks for all the feedback, I'd like to start a vote on the FLIP-449: Reorganization of flink-connector-jdbc [1]. The discussion thread is here [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection or insufficient votes. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen