Hi all,
The voting time for FLIP-69 has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
There were seven +1 votes, 3 of which are binding:
- Bowen Li (binding)
- Jark Wu (binding)
- Kurt Young (binding)
- Xuefu Z (non-binding)
- Peter Huang (non-binding)
- Jingsong Li (non-binding)
- Danny Chan (non-binding)
+1 from my side. They are useful features.
Best,
Jark
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 16:42, Danny Chan wrote:
> +1(non-binding), nice job, Terry ~
>
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年11月5日 +0800 PM10:32，dev@flink.apache.org，写道：
> >
> > +1 to the long missing feature in Flink SQL.
>
+1(non-binding), nice job, Terry ~
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年11月5日 +0800 PM10:32，dev@flink.apache.org，写道：
>
> +1 to the long missing feature in Flink SQL.
Thanks Terry for driving this. +1
With these features, SQL-CLI could be really used.
Best,
Jingsong Lee
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:20 PM Kurt Young wrote:
> Forgot to vote.. +1 from my side.
>
> Best,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:00 AM Kurt Young wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think we
Forgot to vote.. +1 from my side.
Best,
Kurt
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:00 AM Kurt Young wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think we should focus to discuss the document in [DISCUSS] thread and
> keep this vote thread purely for voting.
>
> Otherwise, it's hard for others to collect feedbacks for this topi
Hi all,
I think we should focus to discuss the document in [DISCUSS] thread and
keep this vote thread purely for voting.
Otherwise, it's hard for others to collect feedbacks for this topic.
Best,
Kurt
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:51 PM Terry Wang wrote:
> Hi Rui~
> What you suggested makes sense
Hi Rui~
What you suggested makes sense, remove description and detailed description
from `DESCRIBE DATABASE`.
Open to more comments and votes :)
Best,
Terry Wang
> 2019年11月7日 17:15，Rui Li 写道：
>
> I see, thanks for the clarification. In current implementation, it seems
> just a duplicate of c
I see, thanks for the clarification. In current implementation, it seems
just a duplicate of comment. So I'd prefer not to display it for DESCRIBE
DATABASE, because 1) users have no control over the content and 2) it's
totally redundant. We can add it in the future when we come up with
something mo
Hi Rui~
Description of the database is obtained from `CatalogDatabase#getDescription()`
method, which is implement by CatalogDatebaseImpl. Users don’t need to specify
the description.
Best,
Terry Wang
> 2019年11月7日 15:40，Rui Li 写道：
>
> Thanks Terry for driving this forward.
> Got one questi
Thanks Terry for driving this forward.
Got one question about DESCRIBE DATABASE: the results display comment and
description of a database. While comment can be specified when a database
is created, I don't see how users can specify description of the database?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:16 AM Bowen
Thanks.
As Terry and I discussed offline yesterday, we added a new section to
explain the detailed implementation plan.
+1 (binding) from me.
Bowen
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:33 PM Terry Wang wrote:
> Hi Bowen:
> Thanks for your feedback.
> Your opinion convinced me and I just remove the sectio
Hi Bowen:
Thanks for your feedback.
Your opinion convinced me and I just remove the section about catalog create
statement and also remove `DBPROPERTIES` `PROPERTIES` from alter DDLs.
Open to more comments or votes :) !
Best,
Terry Wang
> 2019年11月6日 07:22，Bowen Li 写道：
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> I w
Hi Terry,
I went over the FLIP in detail again. The FLIP mostly LGTM. A couple issues:
- since we on't plan to support catalog ddl, can you remove them from the
FLIP?
- I found there are some discrepancies in proposed database and table DDLs.
For db ddl, the create db syntax proposes specifying
+1 for the enhancement.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:04 AM Xuefu Z wrote:
> +1 to the long missing feature in Flink SQL.
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:32 AM Terry Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-69[1] which is discussed and
> > reached consensus in the disc
+1 to the long missing feature in Flink SQL.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:32 AM Terry Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to start the vote for FLIP-69[1] which is discussed and
> reached consensus in the discussion thread[2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it
Hi all,
I would like to start the vote for FLIP-69[1] which is discussed and reached
consensus in the discussion thread[2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by 2019-11-08
14:30 UTC, unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
