warnings if the content is such that the user would need to
>> manually fix up the file.
>> If there are minimal user fixups, we should consider automatically
>> migrating the config file to the new format,
>> Kind regards, David.
>>
>>
>>
>
Kind regards, David.
>
>
>
>
> From: Chesnay Schepler
> Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 11:17
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Discuss] FLIP-366: Support standard YAML for
> FLINK configuration
> It is a unfortunate that we'll need a separate conf
:17
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Discuss] FLIP-366: Support standard YAML for FLINK
configuration
It is a unfortunate that we'll need a separate config file but the FLIP
does a good job justifying it.
Personally I'd just name it "config.yaml"; I never quite unde
It is a unfortunate that we'll need a separate config file but the FLIP
does a good job justifying it.
Personally I'd just name it "config.yaml"; I never quite understood why
there was a flink prefix to begin with, and the current proposal
("flink-configuration.yaml") seems unnecessarily
Hi, Junrui,
Sorry for the late reply. The update looks good to me and thanks for your
effort!
Best,
Jane
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:25 PM Yuxin Tan wrote:
> Hi, Junrui
>
> +1 for the proposal.
> Thanks for your effort.
>
> Best,
> Yuxin
>
>
> Samrat Deb 于2023年9月22日周五 13:23写道：
>
> > Hello
Hi, Junrui
+1 for the proposal.
Thanks for your effort.
Best,
Yuxin
Samrat Deb 于2023年9月22日周五 13:23写道：
> Hello Junrui,
>
> +1 for the proposal.
>
>
> Bests,
> Samrat
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:18 AM Shammon FY wrote:
>
> > +1 for the proposal, thanks for driving.
> >
> > Bet,
> > Shammon
Hello Junrui,
+1 for the proposal.
Bests,
Samrat
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:18 AM Shammon FY wrote:
> +1 for the proposal, thanks for driving.
>
> Bet,
> Shammon FY
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:41 PM Yangze Guo wrote:
>
> > Thanks for driving this, +1 for the proposal.
> >
> > Best,
> >
+1 for the proposal, thanks for driving.
Bet,
Shammon FY
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:41 PM Yangze Guo wrote:
> Thanks for driving this, +1 for the proposal.
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:59 AM Lijie Wang
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Junrui,
> >
> > +1 for this proposal, thanks
Thanks for driving this, +1 for the proposal.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:59 AM Lijie Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Junrui,
>
> +1 for this proposal, thanks for driving.
>
> Best,
> Lijie
>
> ConradJam 于2023年9月22日周五 10:07写道：
>
> > +1 Support for standard YAML format facilitates
Hi Junrui,
+1 for this proposal, thanks for driving.
Best,
Lijie
ConradJam 于2023年9月22日周五 10:07写道：
> +1 Support for standard YAML format facilitates specification
>
> Jing Ge 于2023年9月22日周五 02:23写道：
>
> > Hi Junrui,
> >
> > +1 for following the standard. Thanks for your effort!
> >
> > Best
+1 Support for standard YAML format facilitates specification
Jing Ge 于2023年9月22日周五 02:23写道：
> Hi Junrui,
>
> +1 for following the standard. Thanks for your effort!
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 5:09 AM Junrui Lee wrote:
>
> > Hi Jane,
> >
> > Thank you for your valuable
Hi Junrui,
+1 for following the standard. Thanks for your effort!
Best regards,
Jing
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 5:09 AM Junrui Lee wrote:
> Hi Jane,
>
> Thank you for your valuable feedback and suggestions.
> I agree with your point about differentiating between "flink-config.yaml"
> and
Hi Jane,
Thank you for your valuable feedback and suggestions.
I agree with your point about differentiating between "flink-config.yaml"
and "flink-conf.yaml" to determine the standard syntax at a glance.
While I understand your suggestion of using "flink-conf-default.yaml" to
represent the
Hi Junrui,
Thanks for driving this FLIP. +1 for adoption of the standard YAML syntax.
I just have one minor suggestion. It's a little bit challenging to
differentiate between `flink-config.yaml` and `flink-conf.yaml` to
determine which one uses the standard syntax at a glance. How about
using
14 matches
Mail list logo
