Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-29 Thread bo zhaobo
Hi all Thank you very much for all of your kind votes. The voting time for FLIP-250[1] has reached the end of time since we set it up on this Monday(7/25). I'm closing it now. There were 7 votes(+1), 4 of them are binding votes: - Yang Wang (binding) - Martijn Visser (binding) - Kelu Tao

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-28 Thread Márton Balassi
+1 (binding) On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 8:22 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Gyula > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 03:52, MrL wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > 2022年7月27日 09:18,William Wang 写道: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > > > > > >> Hi

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-27 Thread Gyula Fóra
+1 (binding) Gyula On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 03:52, MrL wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > 2022年7月27日 09:18,William Wang 写道: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > >> Now

RE: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-26 Thread wiliam sq
+1 On 2022/07/25 01:37:56 bo zhaobo wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more > objections > or issues were raised in ML thread [2][3]. > > The vote will be opened until July 28th

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-26 Thread MrL
+1 (non-binding) > 2022年7月27日 09:18,William Wang 写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > > bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. >> Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more >> objections >> or

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-26 Thread William Wang
+1 (non-binding) bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > Hi all, > > Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more > objections > or issues were raised in ML thread [2][3]. > > The vote will be opened until

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-26 Thread Kelu Tao
+1 (non-binding) On 2022/07/25 01:37:56 bo zhaobo wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more > objections > or issues were raised in ML thread [2][3]. > > The vote will be opened

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-25 Thread Martijn Visser
+1 (binding) Op ma 25 jul. 2022 om 04:56 schreef Yang Wang : > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Yang > > bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > > > Hi all, > > > > Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > > Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-250: Support Customized Kubernetes Schedulers Proposal

2022-07-24 Thread Yang Wang
+1 (binding) Best, Yang bo zhaobo 于2022年7月25日周一 09:38写道: > Hi all, > > Thank you very much for all feedback after the discussion in [2][3]. > Now I'd like to proceed with the vote for FLIP-250 [1], as no more > objections > or issues were raised in ML thread [2][3]. > > The vote will be opened