big +1
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Till Rohrmann
wrote:
> +1, there is no point in arguing with Knuth.
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > +1 as well.
> >
> > This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
> > in JIRA, which also being
+1, there is no point in arguing with Knuth.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1 as well.
>
> This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
> in JIRA, which also being echoed by Fabian.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Hueske
+1 as well.
This is a great follow-up from my previous email about adding details
in JIRA, which also being echoed by Fabian.
- Henry
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> +1 from me as well.
>
> I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
> repo
+1 from me as well.
I'd like to add that there are many relevant issues in listed in JIRA that
report bugs or describe interesting / important improvements of the system.
Working on one of these issues would be a great contribution to Flink.
Cheers, Fabian
2015-08-16 18:30 GMT+02:00 Sachin Goel
I agree!
A good place to start would be to write an extensive JIRA guidelines page,
an example would be
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.
This is quite crisp and clear.
Further, right now the corresponding guidelines for Flink are on the cwiki
page, but the ma
