Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

Hi Gabor, We will cut the branch today. Best, Joe > On 11.03.2022, at 13:19, Gabor Somogyi wrote: > > Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. > > G > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > >> You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. G On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my > contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter > manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org)

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org) -- but I don't think I'm supposed to be officially doing manually testing on

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

Thanks so much Gabor and Galen. Very much appreciated. > On 07.03.2022, at 19:00, Galen Warren wrote: > > I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: > Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) >

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) . Everything worked but I think there might be a typo in the steps to set up the tests, I left a comment

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

Since I know this area I help to test FLINK-26468 . G On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Johannes Moser wrote: > Hello, > > We will skip tomorrows weekly stabilisation sync. > It looks like all blockers are assigned and worked on. A significant >