introducing such new configurations unless we
have to.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Yuan Mei
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 11:53
To: dev
Cc: ro...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.incremental as true by
default
Hey Lihe Ma,
1. I do not think
about naming the newly in-memory state-backend, which supports
> > >> > > incremental checkpoint, as HeapStateBackend . And let the default
> > >> > > state-backend still stay as HashMapStateBackend.
> > >> > > By doing so, we can:
> > >> &
remental could be
> >> set
> >> > > as true safely, which is so widely accepted according to the
> replies in
> >> > > this thread.
> >> > > 2) your newly in-memory state-backend could also be merged and users
> >> who
> >> > > want to try in-memory
ca.com>:
> > > >
> > > >+1
> > > >
> > > >From my experience, it is actually hard to come up with use cases
> > > >where
> > > >incremental checkpoints should explicitly not be enabled with the
> > > >RocksDB
> > >
;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 在 2022-06-15 21:03:31，"Feifan Wang" 写道：
> > >Thanks for bringing this up.
> > >Strongly +1
> > >
> >
t; >——
> >Name: Feifan Wang
> >Email: zoltar9...@163.com
> >
> >
> > Replied Message
> >| From | Yuan Mei |
> >| Date | 06/15/2022 11:41 |
> >| To | dev ,
> > |
> >| Subject | Re: [DISCUSS ] Make state.backend.in
