Hi, Jim,
Thanks for your feedback, your suggestions are very good. I have replied in the
discussion
mail, please take a look.
> 2022年11月29日 03:18，Jim Hughes 写道：
>
> Hi Shengkai, Yu,
>
> Thanks for the FLIP! I have had a chance to read it, and it looks good. I
> do have some questions:
>
>
Hi Shengkai, Yu,
Thanks for the FLIP! I have had a chance to read it, and it looks good. I
do have some questions:
I do like the idea of unifying the approaches so that the code doesn't get
out of step.
1. For the Client Parser, is it going to work with the extended syntax
from the Flink
Hi, Jim and Alexey.
We have written the proposal[1]. It would be appreciated if you can give us
some feedback.
Best,
Shengkai
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-275%3A+Support+Remote+SQL+Client+Based+on+SQL+Gateway
yu zelin 于2022年11月24日周四 12:06写道：
> Hi Jim,
> Sorry for
Hi Jim,
Sorry for incorrect message in last reply.
> Shengkai will help to your PR
I mean Shengkai will help to review the PRs. And I will add some of your
suggestion to my design.
I think the POC code will be cherry-picked to my new design of SQL Client.
> 2022年11月23日 12:18，yu zelin 写道：
>
> H
Hi Jim,
Sorry for late response. Just another busy week :)
Last week, I’ve discussed within my team about my design. My teammates think
it’s better to unify the local and remote mode, so I’ve investigated and
redesigned a new plan. I’ll inform you after the rewriting of FLIP finished
(will be so
he SQL
>> >>>> Gateway
>> >>>>>>>> that would allow implementing custom authentication and
>> >>>> authorization.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Another question about pe
; > > <mailto:fskm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> Sorry for the late response.
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> In the next version(Flink 1.17), we plan to support t
;>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:13 AM Shengkai Fang <
> >> fskm...@gmail.com
> >>>> <mailto:fskm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for th
way. The FLINK-29486
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29486> is the
>> first
>>>> step to
>>>>>>>>> remove the usage of the `Parser` in the client side, which
>> needs
>>>>
; > > > >> > >> remove the usage of the `Parser` in the client side, which
> > needs
> > > > to read
> > > > >> > >> the table schema during the converting sql node to
> operation. I
> &g
-1.17.
> > > >> > >> But could you share more details about the requirements of the
> > > >> > >> authentication?
> > > >> > >> - Do you use the kerberos or delegation token or password to do
> > the
> > > >> > &g
;> > >>
> > >> > >> For detailed implementation, I think Hive and Presto are good
> > examples to
> > >> > >> dig in. If you have some thoughts about the authentication
> module,
> > >> > >> please let me know.
> > >
he response, Yuxia!
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Shengkai, I would like to learn more about nearest and a bit more
> >> > >>> distant plans about development of the SQL Gateway and the SQL
> Client.
> >> > >>> Do you have
ient.
>> > >>> Do you have a description of the work planned or maybe can share
>> > >>> general
>> > >>> thoughts about the Authentication module, or Persistent Gateway.
>> > >>> How can the authentication part be addresse
ed or maybe can share
> general
> > >>> thoughts about the Authentication module, or Persistent Gateway.
> > >>> How can the authentication part be addressed on the SQL Client side?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> -Alexey
> >
> >>>> is
> >>>> expected to be added?
> >>>> Flink 1.17
> >>>>
> >>>> > “Authentication module” (2) and “Persistent Gateway” (4) as
> >>>> possible future work. Were there any recent discussions on these
>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:24 PM yuxia
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > In what Flink’s release the connection from SQL Client to the
>>>>> Gateway is
>>>>> expected to be added?
>>>>> Flink 1.17
>>>>>
cussions on these
>>>> subjects?
>>>> No recent discussions on these subjects, but I think it'll come in
>>>> Flink 1.17
>>>>
>>>> > Another related topic: are there ideas around making SQL Gateway a
>>>> multi-tenant
&g
k. Were there any recent discussions on these
>>> subjects?
>>> No recent discussions on these subjects, but I think it'll come in Flink
>>> 1.17
>>>
>>> > Another related topic: are there ideas around making SQL Gateway a
>>> multi-tenant
>
gt; Yes.
>>
>> Shengkaiis the maintainer of SQL Client and SQL gateway, maybe he can
>> provide more information.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Yuxia
>>
>> - 原始邮件 -
>> 发件人: "Alexey Leonov-Vendrovskiy"
>> 收件人
Gateway a
> multi-tenant
> component?
> Yes.
>
> Shengkaiis the maintainer of SQL Client and SQL gateway, maybe he can
> provide more information.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yuxia
>
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人: "Alexey Leonov-Vendrovskiy"
> 收件人: "d
xey Leonov-Vendrovskiy"
收件人: "dev"
发送时间: 星期四, 2022年 10 月 13日 下午 12:33:08
主题: SQL Gateway and SQL Client
Hi all,
I’m Alexey from Confluent. This is my first email in this discussion list.
I’m rather new to Flink, and to local customs of communication. I want to
dive deeper and
Hi all,
I’m Alexey from Confluent. This is my first email in this discussion list.
I’m rather new to Flink, and to local customs of communication. I want to
dive deeper and hopefully get more involved over time.
Currently I have a few questions around SQL Gateway and SQL Client.
Specifically I
23 matches
Mail list logo
