OK, as recommended by Fabian, I explain why I like Relational better =)
The concept of Relational suggest the concept of querying data based
on the relationship of different sources and the predicates/ filters
attached to them.
Or we could go more like keyword name such as REMOQ which stands for
I like the Relation or Relational. So maybe we could use DataRelation
as the abstraction?
- Henry
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Fabian Hueske fhue...@gmail.com wrote:
I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows
the terms DataSet and DataStream.
On Mar 16,
I'm in favor of Relation API because the API operates on a set of tuples
with a fixed (flat) schema which is known as relation from relational
databases.
Everybody who took a database intro class should be familiar with this term.
On Mar 21, 2015 5:14 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
Sibao Hong created FLINK-1766:
-
Summary: Fix the bug of equals function of FSKey
Key: FLINK-1766
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1766
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Thanks for the explanation Marton. I've decided to try out for FLINK-1534.
After reading through the thesis[4] and a few other papers[1][2][3], I
believe I've gathered a little context to ask more questions. But I'm still
not sure how Flink's internals work
so please bear with me. Although the
Optimizer and Compiler can stay separate, of course.
I was just thinking that we have a lot of projects and this would be a
simple way to get rid of one. But it actually is intuitive to me as well to
keep them separate.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Fabian Hueske fhue...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Hi Flavio!
I see initially two ways of doing this:
1) Do a series of joins. You start with your subject and join two or three
times using the objects-from-triplets == subject to make one hop. You can
filter the verbs from the triplets before if you are only interested in a
special relationship.
Hi Andra!
I am still not 100% sure about the cause of the problem, but here is a bit
of background on how we model the computation as a delta iteration and how
you can extend the vertex state. Maybe that helps answer your question.
When using delta iterations for vertex-centric iterations, we
Very nice post, Till!
We are starting to get much better with this...
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Awesome, thanks Till
On Saturday, March 21, 2015, Till Rohrmann trohrm...@apache.org wrote:
I wrote some internal documentation for Akka and
You can always have the vertex value being a tuple3 and let the user set
only a part of it (the value).
It would work the same way as with the vertex key - the user function can
see it, but not change it.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Andra Lungu lungu.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephan,
Hi,
I would like to subscribe to the Apache Flink developer mailing list.
Regards,
Devesh Gade.
--
Tough times dont last,Tough People Do.
Hi,
You can subscribe to the mailing list by sending a email to
dev-subscr...@flink.apache.org mailto:dev-subscr...@flink.apache.org.
Other mailing lists about Flink are in
http://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists
http://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists
Regards.
Hi,
You can subscribe to the mailing list by sending a email to
dev-subscr...@flink.apache.org mailto:dev-subscr...@flink.apache.org.
Other mailing lists about Flink are in
http://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists
http://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists.
Regards.
13 matches
Mail list logo