Merged to master :-) Furthermore, updated JIRA with sub tasks for the
missing content:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4463
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> Very nice work Ufuk!
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Till Rohrmann
Very nice work Ufuk!
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> I second Aljoscha :-)
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
> wrote:
>
>> I checked it out and I liked it. :-)
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 at 19:40 Ufuk Celebi
I second Aljoscha :-)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> I checked it out and I liked it. :-)
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 at 19:40 Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> > Initial PR for the layout: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2387
> >
> > On
I checked it out and I liked it. :-)
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 at 19:40 Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> Initial PR for the layout: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2387
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at
Initial PR for the layout: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2387
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at 03:15 Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
>> +1 :-)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Stephan Ewen
+1
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 at 03:15 Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1 :-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > +1, thanks :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> >
> > > If there are no objections,
+1 :-)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> +1, thanks :-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
>
> > If there are no objections, I would like to work on this in the next
> > days. I would like to only do the restructuring
+1, thanks :-)
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> If there are no objections, I would like to work on this in the next
> days. I would like to only do the restructuring and don't add any new
> content (e.g. we would have a few empty pages in the beginning).
>
If there are no objections, I would like to work on this in the next
days. I would like to only do the restructuring and don't add any new
content (e.g. we would have a few empty pages in the beginning).
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> I added to the
I added to the "Application Development" Docs the Section "Types,
TypeInformation, Serialization".
I think that is an important enough aspect to warrant separate docs.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> +1 for the FLIP and making streaming the common
+1 I like it a lot!
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 at 18:43 Stephan Ewen wrote:
> My take would be to take streaming as the common case and make special
> sections for batch.
>
> We can still have a few streaming-only sections (end to end exactly once)
> and a few batch-only sections
My take would be to take streaming as the common case and make special
sections for batch.
We can still have a few streaming-only sections (end to end exactly once)
and a few batch-only sections (optimizer).
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> I very much
I very much like this proposal. This is long overdue. Our
documentation never "broke up" with the old batch focus. That's where
the current structure comes from and why people often don't find what
they are looking for. We were trying to treat streaming and batch as
equals. We never were "brave"
Hi all!
I posted another FLIP - this time about a suggestion to make the
documentation more accessible.
FLIP-3 - Organization of Documentation
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-3+-+Organization+of+Documentation
The issue of accessibility of information came up repeatedly
14 matches
Mail list logo