Thanks everyone for your input on this!
@Fabian: I concur with utilizing the ASF infra and ASF Docker Hub
organization to build and host any "less-critical" images like you propose.
I would also add RC builds to that list, as alluded to in my original email.
--
Patrick
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at
Thanks all for chiming in. I'll continue tomorrow with a VOTE as suggested
by Till.
Regarding my initially proposed timeline: I don't think we will have
everything ready before the first 1.10 RC, but I also think it's not that
big of a deal. ;-)
– Ufuk
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:59 AM Till
+1 for Ufuk's proposal how to proceed. I guess the immediate next step
would be a VOTE for accepting the dockerfiles and where to store them.
Cheers,
Till
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:05 PM Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First of all, thank you very much Patrick for maintaining and
Hi everyone,
First of all, thank you very much Patrick for maintaining and publishing
the Flink Docker images so far and for starting this discussion!
I'm in favor of adding the Dockerfiles in a separate repository and not in
the main Flink repository.
I also think that it makes sense to first
Hey all,
first of all a big thank you for driving many of the Docker image releases
in the last two years.
*(1) Moving docker-flink/docker-flink to apache/docker-flink*
+1 to do this as you outlined. I would propose to aim for a first
integration with the 1.10 release without major changes to
Big +1 for
* official images in a separate repository
* unified images (session cluster vs application cluster)
* images for development in Apache flink repository
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:14 PM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Thanks a lot for starting this discussion Patrick! I think it is a very
>
Thanks a lot for starting this discussion Patrick! I think it is a very
good idea to move Flink's docker image more under the jurisdiction of the
Flink PMC and to make it releasing new docker images part of Flink's
release process (not saying that we cannot release new docker images
independent of
Hi Patrick,
Thanks a lot for your continued work on the Docker images. That’s really
really a great job! And I have also benefited from it.
Big +1 for integrating docker image publication into the Flink release
process since we can leverage the Flink release process to make sure a more
Big +1 for this effort.
It is really exciting we have started this great work. More and more
companies start to
use Flink in container environment(docker, Kubernetes, Mesos, even
Yarn-3.x). So it is
very important that we could have unified official image building and
releasing process.
The
Hi everyone,
I would like to start a discussion about integrating publication of the
Flink Docker images hosted on Docker Hub[1] more tightly with the Flink
release process. Apologies in advance for the long post.
More than two and a half years ago (time flies!) we introduced “official”
Docker
10 matches
Mail list logo
