OK, I think we got a clear picture here.
I'll update the corresponding JIRA issue FLINK-1045.
Thanks, Fabian
2016-01-14 18:53 GMT+01:00 Henry Saputra :
> +1 for approach #1
>
>
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Chiwan Park
>
+1 for approach #1
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Chiwan Park wrote:
> I’m also for approach #1. Now is nice time to apply some API-breaking
> changes.
>
> > On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m also for
I’m also for approach #1. Now is nice time to apply some API-breaking changes.
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>
> I’m also for Approach #1. I like simplifying things.
>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 14:25, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>>
Hi Fabian,
thanks for bringing this issue up. I agree with you that it would be nice
to remove the Combinable annotation if it is not really needed. Now if
people are not aware of the Combinable interface then they might think that
they are actually using combiners by simply implementing
Hi everybody,
As part of the upcoming 1.0 release we are stabilizing Flink's APIs.
I would like to start a discussion about removing the Combinable annotation
from the DataSet API.
# The Current State:
The DataSet API offers two interface for combine functions, CombineFunction
and