Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

What is the status here: https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/12 Please give feedback. On 10/28/2015 11:02 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > Thanks Matthias! I made a comment. Please open a pull request. > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: >> Just

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Thanks Matthias! I made a comment. Please open a pull request. On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Just updated this. Improved the layout and added FastR project. > > https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page > > -Matthias > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Just updated this. Improved the layout and added FastR project. https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page -Matthias On 10/27/2015 03:25 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Hi, > > I updated the flink-external section on the Flink Web-Page: >

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Hi, I updated the flink-external section on the Flink Web-Page: https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page The section is now located in "Contribute" page. The layout needs some refinement though... Some Project are "previews", ie, Flink support was announced but there is not

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Hi, I just started this. Please see https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page I think, it is the best way to extend the "Downloads" page. I would also add a link to this on the main page's "Getting Started" section. As a first try, I started like this: > Third party packages >

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Cool. Right now the list is empty. Do you already have a list you could include in the upcoming pull request? :) On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Hi, > > I just started this. Please see > https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/tree/flink-external-page > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

I was not sure what we should add and was hoping for input from the community. I am aware of the following projects we might want to add: - Zeppelin - SAMOA - Mahout - Cascading (dataartisan repo) - BigPetStore - Gradoop -Matthias On 10/09/2015 03:07 PM, Maximilian Michels

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Thank you Matthias! I'm not sure where the "Downloads" section is the right place for this. I would actually put it under "Community", with a header "External Contributions" or something like this, but I'm not feeling strong about this :) -Vasia. On 9 October 2015 at 15:29, Matthias J. Sax

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Yes, Community is a better place. You can also add the Dataflow Runner https://github.com/dataArtisans/flink-dataflow. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote: > Thank you Matthias! > > I'm not sure where the "Downloads" section is the right place for

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

+1 for Vasia's suggestion. It's a good and pragmatic start. Putting such contributions into an Apache-managed repository might have some side effects. 2015-10-08 12:15 GMT+02:00 Vasiliki Kalavri : > How about, for now, we simply create a page where we gather

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

+1 for your pragmatic approach, Vasia. A simple collection of third party software using Flink should be enough for now; of course, outside the Apache realm. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Chiwan Park wrote: > +1 for Vasia’s suggestion. From a long-term perspective, the

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

How about, for now, we simply create a page where we gather links/short descriptions of all these contributions and let the maintenance and dependency management to the tool/library creators? This way we will at least have these contributions in one place and link to them somewhere from the

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Thanks for the feedback. I think, the repository does not need to build on a single Flink release. From my point of view, there should be a single parent module that contains *independent modules* for each extension/library (there should be no "cross dependencies" between the modules and each

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Should we add a new page at Flink project web page? On 10/08/2015 12:56 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: > +1 for your pragmatic approach, Vasia. A simple collection of third > party software using Flink should be enough for now; of course, > outside the Apache realm. > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

+1 for Vasia’s suggestion. From a long-term perspective, the site like Spark Packages [1] would be helpful to manage external contribution. [1] http://spark-packages.org > On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. > > I think, the

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

Hi Matthias, Thanks for bringing up this idea. Actually, it has been discussed a couple of times on the mailing list whether we should have a central place for third-party extensions/contributions/libraries. This could either be something package-based or, like you proposed, another repository.

Re: [DISCUSS] flink-external

IMHO we can do that. There should be a disclaimer that the third party software is not officially supported. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Should we add a new page at Flink project web page? > > On 10/08/2015 12:56 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote: >> +1

[DISCUSS] flink-external

Hi, many people are building quite exiting stuff on top of Flink. It is hard to keep an good overview on what stuff is available and what not. What do you think about starting a second git repository "flink-external" that collects all those code? The ideas would be to collect stuff in a central