Re: Flink ML - NaN Handling

2017-02-12 Thread Stavros Kontopoulos
Ok cool thnx Till. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > Hi Stavros, > > so far we've sticked mainly to scikit-learn in terms of semantics. Thus, I > would recommend to follow scikit-learn's approach to handle NaNs. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Fri, Feb 10,

Re: Flink ML - NaN Handling

2017-02-12 Thread Till Rohrmann
Hi Stavros, so far we've sticked mainly to scikit-learn in terms of semantics. Thus, I would recommend to follow scikit-learn's approach to handle NaNs. Cheers, Till On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Stavros Kontopoulos < st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, > > Is there a story for

Flink ML - NaN Handling

2017-02-10 Thread Stavros Kontopoulos
Hello guys, Is there a story for this (might have been discussed earlier)? I see differences between scikit-learn and numpy. Do we standardize on scikit-learn? PS. I am working on the preprocessing stuff. Best, Stavros