Hi Mason,
First off, thanks for putting this FLIP together! Sorry for the delay. Full
disclosure Mason and I chatted a little bit at Flink Forward 2022 but I
have tried to capture the questions I had for him then.
I'll start the conversation with a few questions:
1. The concept of streamIds is
Hi all,
Circling back on this--I have created a first draft document in confluence:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-246%3A+Multi+Cluster+Kafka+Source
.
Looking forward to hear all your feedback in this email thread!
Best,
Mason
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:57 AM Thomas
Hi Mason,
I added mason6345 to the Flink confluence space, you should be able to
add a FLIP now.
Looking forward to the contribution!
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 9:25 AM Martijn Visser wrote:
>
> Hi Mason,
>
> I'm sure there's a PMC (*hint*) out there who can grant you access to
> create a
Hi Mason,
I'm sure there's a PMC (*hint*) out there who can grant you access to
create a FLIP. Looking forward to it, this sounds like an improvement that
users are looking forward to.
Best regards,
Martijn
Op di 28 jun. 2022 om 09:21 schreef Mason Chen :
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback! I'm adding the users, who responded in the user
mailing list, to this thread.
@Qingsheng - Yes, I would prefer to reuse the existing Kafka connector
module. It makes a lot of sense since the dependencies are the same and the
implementation can also extend and
Hi Mason,
Thanks for starting this discussion! The proposed Source sounds awesome and
we would be interested in taking a look at the source code and evaluating
our use cases. We can provide information and review on a potential FLIP
based on other use cases.
Do you have a fork/branch that you
Hi Mason,
It sounds like an exciting enhancement to the Kafka source and will benefit a
lot of users I believe.
Would you prefer to reuse the existing flink-connector-kafka module or create a
new one for the new multi-cluster feature? Personally I prefer the former one
because users won’t
