Christian Grobmeier wrote:
There has, in the past, been some interest in a "lightweight"
forrest. However, I suspect for you to gather interest here it would
have to reuse much of what is going on in the Forrest world, i.e. be
able to use existing plugins (or at least substantial
Hi,
> Some of the issues you raise were what prompted me to experiment with
> Forrest 2. I created a simple prototype of Forrest 2 a long time ago,
> however, I've since moved onto other things (Apache Sling provides much of
> what I, personally, need). This was intended to simplify the use of Fo
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
This brought me to the conclusion that I need a lightweight Forrest.
Means: less features but easier and an easy installation.
I have stolen the great ideas of cocoon and forrest and wrote something
similar in PHP.
I call it PIWI and you can check it out here: http:
>
>
>> 1) its complex and one cannot start immediatly if you want a bit more than
>> just writing content. Even implementing your own design can bring you some
>> pain in the ass.
>> 2) its java and i can only use it for projects which have an own server
>> running, the rights to install it and so
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
However at the end I think Forrest has very good ideas and concepts but two
drawbacks:
1) its complex and one cannot start immediatly if you want a bit more than
just writing content. Even implementing your own design can bring you some
pain in the ass.
2) its java and
form-handling, but we plan to implement this
beginning in september. A cache would also be nice.
Currently we develop at Google Code but I was curious about if the Forrest
project or some developers here are interested in this
implementation. I know there are not to much php folks at apache, but mayb
