Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-05 Thread David Crossley
Brian M Dube wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Brian M Dube wrote: > > > > > > > > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml > > > > > > > > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents > > > > without declaring a DTD > > > > > > This looks good. Is the idea to replace the

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-04 Thread Brian M Dube
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:49:57PM +1000, David Crossley wrote: > Brian M Dube wrote: > > > > > > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml > > > > > > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents > > > without declaring a DTD > > > > This looks good. Is the idea to replace

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-03 Thread David Crossley
Brian M Dube wrote: > > > > FOR-1172 - enable validation of the internal xml > > > > FOR-1173 - add demonstration of using xml source documents > > without declaring a DTD > > This looks good. Is the idea to replace the Ant target with pipeline > validation? I don't know. I like the fact that t

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-02 Thread Brian M Dube
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 01:30:26AM +1000, David Crossley wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > Brian M Dube wrote: > > > > > > There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this > > > support. > > > > Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude > > was added to the DTD. > > http://iss

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-02 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > > Still need to get XInclude processing done a bit earlier > in the sitemaps. That is done now. See r781260. -David

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-06-01 Thread David Crossley
David Crossley wrote: > Brian M Dube wrote: > > > > There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this > > support. > > Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude > was added to the DTD. > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032 > > > I found a very old discussion [1] about

Re: XInclude preprocessor - new thread for old topic

2009-05-29 Thread David Crossley
Brian M Dube wrote: > > There will always be one more place in the DTD to add this > support. Yes, that worried me too when the initial XInclude was added to the DTD. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-1032 > I found a very old discussion [1] about processing XInclude > before validation.