Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-12 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: ... Can i please get clarification about the outcome. The proposed solution evolved to the following: We have bridge code as AL2 in our SVN, all discussion and development can happen our asf mailing list. The optional "binary" is not the concern of t

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-11 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > Cliff Schmidt wrote: > >Cliff Schmidt wrote: > > > >>I give you the long answer for two reasons: a) to give you an > >>understanding for the ideas behind all those rules, and b) to make > >>sure I'm not misleading anyone into thinking that distributing an > >>LGPL libra

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-11 Thread Ross Gardler
Cliff Schmidt wrote: On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: I give you the long answer for two reasons: a) to give you an understanding for the ideas behind all those rules, and b) to make sure I'm not misleading anyone into thinking that distributing an LGPL library within an

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-10 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Jul 10, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: I give you the long answer for two reasons: a) to give you an understanding for the ideas behind all those rules, and b) to make sure I'm not misleading anyone into thinking that distributing an LGPL library within an Apache product would ca

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-10 Thread Cliff Schmidt
, David Crossley wrote: Hi Cliff, we are having a discussion on the Forrest dev mailing list about how to cope with plugins where our developers want to use third-party products from the http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#category-x Re: plugins with some excluded licenses http://marc

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-05 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: There is a very relevant post on cocoon-dev today. Yeah, I saw that. Looks like our interpretation of the FAQ was correct. So what to do? Incidentally, my OSCommerce plugin will not be created at this time. We've decided to take another route, which does not involve Fo

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-04 Thread David Crossley
There is a very relevant post on cocoon-dev today. Torsten and Sylvain spoke to Cliff at ApacheCon about a similar scenario for Cocoon. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=115201663025186 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel/65071/focus=65163 Message-ID: 44AA60CD.90007

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-04 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I'm working on an OSCommerce plugin (see mail thread with Brian). This plugin has a dependency on Hibernate which is LGPL and therefore cannot be housed here in Apache. I've requested a project "Forrest Plugins" on Sourceforge to house this work. I

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-03 Thread David Crossley
Hi Cliff, we are having a discussion on the Forrest dev mailing list about how to cope with plugins where our developers want to use third-party products from the http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#category-x Re: plugins with some excluded licenses http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t

Re: plugins with some excluded licenses

2006-07-03 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >>I'm working on an OSCommerce plugin (see mail thread with Brian). This > >>plugin has a dependency on Hibernate which is LGPL and therefore cannot > >>be housed here in Apache. > >> > >>I've requested a project "Forrest Plugins" on Sourceforge to house this > >>work.