On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 16:20 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I have been thinking a lot about "Views", the positioning in the Forrest
> concepts and the naming.
>
> I came to the conclusion that the best thing to do is to call them
> Forrest Templates. It's the templating system that is used to
Diwaker Gupta wrote:
I'm not sure if everyone got a chance to go through this in the midst of
ApacheCon, so I'm providing the link here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.forrest.devel/14616
Just some of my thoughts on views in response to Ross's original email.
Yeah we did bring most
I'm not sure if everyone got a chance to go through this in the midst of
ApacheCon, so I'm providing the link here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.forrest.devel/14616
Just some of my thoughts on views in response to Ross's original email.
On Friday 22 July 2005 7:20 am, Nicola Ken Baro
>
> I have been thinking a lot about "Views", the positioning in the Forrest
> concepts and the naming.
>
> I came to the conclusion that the best thing to do is to call them
> Forrest Templates. It's the templating system that is used to style the
> pages.
+1 - views is confusing for a number of
I have been thinking a lot about "Views", the positioning in the Forrest
concepts and the naming.
I came to the conclusion that the best thing to do is to call them
Forrest Templates. It's the templating system that is used to style the
pages.
At this point, one thing comes to mind... what makes
