Let us get some planning happening or we are going to have trouble
getting the release out.
We obviously missed the dates of 2003-03-25 and 2005-03-22
because we need code-freeze and testing for one week beforehand.
I suggest the following release plan:
Code freeze and testing starts on
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
...
(Getting the documentation published, even if only in a manual way would
be important for example).
Do you mean the documentation for the various plugins?
Yes, and I mean I will do that (unless someone gets to it before I do).
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:30:12PM +0100, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Florian,
Florian G. Haas wrote:
Not trying to sound like the impatient type -- which I nonetheless am,
as I'll readily admit :-) -- but it seems to me that a few past
patches by contributors haven't made it into the trunk
David Crossley wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Dave Brondsema wrote:
Because 0.6 docs are not split, things are pretty confusing. I
speculate it might be worth it to get a 0.7 release out the door
primarily so our online docs make sense. 0.7-dev has been pretty stable
for a
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Dave Brondsema wrote:
Because 0.6 docs are not split, things are pretty confusing. I
speculate it might be worth it to get a 0.7 release out the door
primarily so our online docs make sense. 0.7-dev has been pretty stable
for a while and it has
David Crossley wrote:
...
It takes quite a while to get ready for a release. It would be good
to wait until Ross can help a bit because plugins is the major change
for this release. I will also be busy for the next two weeks.
Should we aim for a release date of Friday 2005-03-25?
My birthday :-)
