Hi,
Just a really minor trivial thing, for your next release you might want to
update the year in the NOTICE file to include the current year.
Thanks,
Justin
Vote for releasing Apache FreeMarker 2.3.31 passed with the following
results: 4 "+1" binding votes, no "0" votes, no "-1" votes. Thus, this
version is recommended for release by the PMC, and I will continue
with the release steps, and announce the new release about 24 hours
from now.
Daniel
+1 (binding)
I was the release engineer, and didn't notice anything out of order.
I also tested the release with FMPP (test suite passes), and Docgen
(generates exactly the same output for the FreeMarker Manual).
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:19 PM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote
+1 (binding)
Tested in OFBiz trunk HEAD, UI and console OK. I even spotted an old small
issue in log that did not show before :)
Jacques
Le 13/02/2021 à 12:31, Siegfried Goeschl a écrit :
+1 (non-binding)
Tested with freemarker-generator
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
On
+1 (non-binding)
Tested with freemarker-generator
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 12.02.2021, at 20:12, Christoph Rüger wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Verified running our testsuite containing some FM related tests
> with org.freemarker.freemarker-2.3.31.jar .
> no regression
+1 (non-binding)
Verified running our testsuite containing some FM related tests
with org.freemarker.freemarker-2.3.31.jar .
no regression found, all testcases successful.
Regards
Christoph
Am Mi., 10. Feb. 2021 um 23:51 Uhr schrieb Woonsan Ko :
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified the following:
> -
+1 (binding)
Verified the following:
- gpg --verify with the .asc files: OK
- sha512 checksums: OK
- builds and artifacts in both "normal" and "gae": OK
(ant, ant test, ant javadoc, ant manualOffline, ant maven-install)
- testing in a CMS product with the freemarker-2.3.31.jar: OK
Regards,
+1 (binding)
checksum, signature, build and tests are all successful.
Jacopo Cappellato
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:20 PM Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.31!
>
> As there were changes in the last few days, don't skip testing with
> your dependent
Ah, indeed, ARM allows reordering stores and such. I don't think the test
suite (that runs on Travis on ARM) has much chance to uncover such bugs, if
any exists. FM has not-so-trivial concurrency at a few places. But at least
I never assumed anything that the JVM memory model doesn't guarantee.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:23 AM Daniel Dekany
wrote:
> Ah yes. I forgot to add the build and CI related improvements from the
> release notes (there were others too). I will add those to the version
> history post release (can't modify artifacts being voted upon).
>
> But I think it will
Ah yes. I forgot to add the build and CI related improvements from the
release notes (there were others too). I will add those to the version
history post release (can't modify artifacts being voted upon).
But I think it will be soon taken as granted that all Java libraries work
on ARM (unless
Hi,
On 2021/02/09 22:19:49, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.31!
>
> As there were changes in the last few days, don't skip testing with
> your dependent projects, even if you already did it recently.
>
> Release Notes:
>
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.31!
As there were changes in the last few days, don't skip testing with
your dependent projects, even if you already did it recently.
Release Notes:
https://freemarker.apache.org/builds/2.3.31-voting/versions_2_3_31.html
Before proceed, you
13 matches
Mail list logo
