It's in the "official" repo, branch FREEMARKER-154.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:27 PM Siegfried Goeschl <
siegfried.goes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I think my memory is playing tricks on me - I'm pretty sure that there was
> some repo with the freemarker-generator documentation you star
Hi Daniel,
I think my memory is playing tricks on me - I'm pretty sure that there was some
repo with the freemarker-generator documentation you started?
Can't find it on my laptop, can't find it in Git - any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 27.10.2021, at 14:23, Daniel Dekan
So, you plan to rewrite the documentation starting out from a blank sheet,
right? Then I indeed shouldn't put more energy into the conversion, and at
least Docgen has become more capable while trying to port the existing
documentation. The new examples should be chosen so that they are
realisticall
Hi Daniel,
Don't be so harsh ;-)
* No plans to maintain the Maven site after the initial release
* This is open source and therefore best effort
* Guess supporting Java 8 date / time is much more important for the community
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 24.10.2021, at 23:38, Da
I did not mean that any of them are blocking.
Keeping two documentation up to date is a growing pain. It's my weakness
though that it's still not done. Yet, if you plan to do a bigger reworking,
it's better done on the DocBook version.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 6:58 PM Siegfried Goeschl <
siegfried
Hi Daniel,
Both topics are non-blocking in my opinion
Regarding documentation:
A complete Maven website including Markdown content is generated. And
documentation will be updated, extended and moved to Docbook but that can be
done any time - no need to introduce additional dependencies
Regar
Yes, I guess we can get away with the Maven generated site, if the standard
ASF footer and that conference ad thingy can be added. It would be more
rational to push through with the conversion to DocBook though. The main
cause of the slowdown is that I had this idea that we actually run
everything
Hi Daniel,
There is still the Maven-based site which can be created using
> mvn clean site site:stage
I will look into the source release packages ...
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
> On 24.10.2021, at 11:38, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> Still no site for example. Note sure about the ot
Still no site for example. Note sure about the others, had to review last
time's list.
Can we build a source release package with all the necessary
NOTICE-s/LICENSE-s and signing? For this kind of project we will also want
a binary release package.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Siegfried Goesch
Hi folks,
What stops us from having the first release? Any blockers we are aware of?
Thanks in advance,
Siegfried Goeschl
10 matches
Mail list logo
