Fwd: Error when processing doap file https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker-site.git;a=blob_plain;f=doap.rdf;hb=HEAD:

The DOAP appears to have moved. Please update projects.xml with the new location. -- Forwarded message -- From: Projects Date: 31 March 2018 at 03:00 Subject: Error when processing doap file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Jacques, tomorrow I will send you the patch. Jacopo Il Sab 31 Mar 2018, 20:13 Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: > Le 31/03/2018 à 19:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : > > Saturday, March 31, 2018, 5:44:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Sha1 and MD5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Jacques, you should be able to test the new release in OFBiz with the following changes Jacopo Index: build.gradle === --- build.gradle (revision 1827982) +++ build.gradle (working copy) @@ -76,6 +79,9 @@ repositories{

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Jacques, You can't test the pre-release via download from maven central or jcenter, it isn't there yet. In gradle you have to comment the existing current version dependency and add a local one which I believe is what Jacopo mentioned sending a patch for. This isn't a Freemarker issue or an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Thanks Jacopo, Yes, that's what I have used. just that I used the complete url:     url "https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker; instead. I agree with you and Daniel that using a more generic url is better (cover more cases if needed). Note for myself: I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Le 31/03/2018 à 19:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : Saturday, March 31, 2018, 5:44:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: +1 (binding) Sha1 and MD5 on freemarker-2.3.28.jar OK. I think we should drop sha1 with md5 and provide sha256 at least. For now it's OK with sha1 as Jacopo's link at [1] says. But

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Le 31/03/2018 à 22:42, Daniel Dekany a écrit : We are talking about two different things. The material linked by Jacopo talks about the checksums used on dist.apache.org (like https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/freemarker/engine/2.3.28/source/), not about the Maven repositories. Also, as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Hi David, Yes, I know it's not in maven central or jcenter, since it's not yet released. That's why I did not test using maven central or jcenter, but using my own local .m2 repo: C:\Users\Jacques\.m2\repository\org\freemarker\freemarker\2.3.28 and copying freemarker-2.3.28 pom and jar files

Re: Fwd: Error when processing doap file https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker-site.git;a=blob_plain;f=doap.rdf;hb=HEAD:

Thanks, fix committed into projects.xml! Sunday, April 1, 2018, 12:13:47 AM, sebb wrote: > The DOAP appears to have moved. Please update projects.xml with the > new location. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Projects > Date: 31 March 2018 at 03:00 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Thanks Jacopo, > > Yes, that's what I have used. No, your patch is different from mine and this is why it is not able to fetch the files from the staging Maven repository. Please check the differences of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

+1 On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Swapnil Mane wrote: > +1 > > > - Best Regards, > Swapnil M Mane > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 4:01 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please vote on releasing FreeMarker 2.3.28! Note that as this is not >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

+1 (binding) ***verifications performed on apache-freemarker-2.3.28-src.tar.gz: verified successfully sha512 verified successfully md5 (however with the new policy updates this checksum can be removed in future releases, see [1]) verified successfully the signature build successful all unit tests

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

+1 (binding) Sha1 and MD5 on freemarker-2.3.28.jar OK. I think we should drop sha1 with md5 and provide sha256 at least. For now it's OK with sha1 as Jacopo's link at [1] says. OFBiz trunk HEAD with freemarker-2.3.28 works well (for myself to remember: putting  pom+jar in my local maven repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.28

Saturday, March 31, 2018, 5:44:07 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Sha1 and MD5 on freemarker-2.3.28.jar OK. > > I think we should drop sha1 with md5 and provide sha256 at least. > > For now it's OK with sha1 as Jacopo's link at [1] says. But we don't provide an sha1. It's an