It's OK now with Chris Lambertus's help
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16498 to continue
Jacques
Le 06/05/2018 à 09:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks
Just tried, did not work, not sure why
Le 05/05/2018 à 19:05, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
I'm a sudoer, so I can add you. Try now!
Saturday, May 5, 2018, 3:07:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
I did not, but actually as I'm not in the sudoers it does not help:
otp-md5 499 fr516
Password:
jleroux is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
jleroux@freemarker-vm:~$
Jacques
Le 05/05/2018 à 12:38, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Saturday, May 5, 2018, 11:24:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I asked for sudo: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15775
Have you done the OTP stuff? See on:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FREEMARKER/try.freemarker.org+maintenance+and+installation
Jacques
Le 01/05/2018 à 14:50, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
Yes completely forgot about that. I just checked and I have access to the VM.
Since we need to do it ourselves, I'll have a look, hopefully this week (very
possible)
Cheers
Jacques
Le 30/04/2018 à 16:51, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Seems this was forgotten. Do you plan to do it?
Monday, January 8, 2018, 11:04:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
That's a good news. I did not want to get further with
try.freemarker.org waiting for this to happen. Once LetsEncrypt setting is done
a redirection
should be enough
Jacques
Le 08/01/2018 à 09:47, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
Greg commented on the request:
try.freemarker.apache.org now works, and is propagated.
Since that hostname maps to your VM, the certificate to be used for
try.freemarker.apache.org will need to be hosted/operated by your VM.
Infra's current policy for project VMs is to use LetsEncrypt for
certificates. [~pono] will get you set up with that.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018, 11:34:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Good, Greg closed INFRA-15476
Jacques
Le 03/01/2018 à 21:23, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
I'm "a bit" late with this, but I have created the issue for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-15775
Friday, December 15, 2017, 1:57:04 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
To summarize, the opininos were (whether we should switch to
try.freemarker.apache.org):
- Daniel Dekany: We better not risk not doing this
- Jacopo Cappellato: Agrees with me (above) in this
- Jacques Le Roux: No opinion was expressed, but it's technically fine
- Ralph Goers: It's certainly not necessary to do
So, unless someone has more to add, I will ask this from Infra in the
coming days... just to be on the safe side.
Wednesday, November 29, 2017, 6:38:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
The difference is that try.freemarker.org
<http://try.freemarker.org/> is a companion site. So long as the
main site is freemarker.apache.org I don’t think anyone will complain about a
companion site.
Ralph
On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
wrote:
Hi Ralph,
IIRW openoffice.org is an exception. There are others, when the domain was well
established before entering the incubator, subversion.org
comes to mind.
IMO freemarker.org was well established before entering the incubator but not
try.freemarker.apache.org which is quite recent. Hence maybe
some caution needed...
My 2 cts
Jacques
Le 29/11/2017 à 14:55, Ralph Goers a écrit :
Personally, I don’t see why there should be a problem as long as try.freemarker.org
<http://try.freemarker.org/> is an Apache controlled
domain. You aren’t the only project that has a vanity domain. See www.openoffice.org
<http://www.openoffice.org/> as an example.
Ralph
On Nov 29, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@apache.org> wrote:
Just as a reminder, I'm planning to request try.freemarker.apache.org,
from Infra and then redirect try.freemarker.org to it, because I'm
worried that the IPMC will dislike that we use try.freemarker.org as
the canonical address of the online template tester. It will also use
https and a LetsEncrypt certificate (we can't use the *.apache.org
cert on a VM).
BTW, using a sub-sub domains is a bit extreme. I'm not aware of any
gotchas in out case, but if anyone is aware some, like LetsEncrypt
doesn't support them or something, please stop me! (Also, as this way
we will receive the cookies of freemarker.apache.org, but certainly we
will able to cope with that, if it ever causes a problem.)
Any comments? And do you (especially PPMC members) agree?
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
