Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

2016-01-18 Thread Sergio Fernández
Hi Daniel, my issue with such workflow is that behind the assertion that "All the links remain as they were" there is a potential mismatch between the latest release and the downloaded one, as Jacopo pointed with the hashes. Specific release source must be linked in the vote email. Normally ASF

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

2016-01-18 Thread Daniel Dekany
It's iteration over the same public release (2.3.24-rc01), before sending it to voting on general@incubator. There are no downloads for the attempts except for the last. ("All the links remain as they were.", as the mail said.) But of course, I will include the links directly in later votes. Have

Re: [VOTE] Release FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01-incubating, attempt 3

2016-01-18 Thread Sergio Fernández
-1 (binding), source link is missing from the vote email Something confusing on the overall release is that normally RC releases are what here are called attepts, because the project actually wants to publish RCs; so I guess the attempt number should be kept somewhere, folder name or wherever. On