Le 04/08/2017 à 16:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Dear PPCM members, please tell me if you agree, or there's any problem.
John D. Ament had some concerns (see his "Is Freemarker becoming too
process heavy?" thread), but he didn't follow t
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the solution and sorry for the late reaction. The
Environment.getCurrentEnvironment().getCurrentTeamplte() works in this case and
we'll use it for now to distinguish between initial loads and consecutive
includes/imports.
In future releases we'd definitely like more cont
Tuesday, August 8, 2017, 1:52:50 PM, Mickel Daelmans | Add to Favorites wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the solution and sorry for the late reaction. The
> Environment.getCurrentEnvironment().getCurrentTeamplte() works in
> this case and we'll use it for now to distinguish between initial
> loa
Monday, August 7, 2017, 9:18:36 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> If you are going to implement these directly as
>> TemplateDirectiveModel-s and TemplateFunctionModel-s, then you better
>> wait until I merge at least the FREEMARKER-63 PR... probably
