Re: [PPMC] Re: Proposed policy change: Don't require CLA from contributos

2017-08-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Le 04/08/2017 à 16:48, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: Dear PPCM members, please tell me if you agree, or there's any problem. John D. Ament had some concerns (see his "Is Freemarker becoming too process heavy?" thread), but he didn't follow t

Re: [PPMC] Re: Proposed policy change: Don't require CLA from contributos

2017-08-04 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Dear PPCM members, please tell me if you agree, or there's any problem. > > John D. Ament had some concerns (see his "Is Freemarker becoming too > process heavy?" thread), but he didn't follow through when I asked > back. > > Anyway, why I w

[PPMC] Re: Proposed policy change: Don't require CLA from contributos

2017-08-03 Thread Daniel Dekany
Dear PPCM members, please tell me if you agree, or there's any problem. John D. Ament had some concerns (see his "Is Freemarker becoming too process heavy?" thread), but he didn't follow through when I asked back. Anyway, why I want this is that even if very rarely, sometimes we get very trivial