Re: [DISCUSS] Move or remove org.apache.geode.admin

I would be very upset and surprised as a user or developer if Geode never has any major releases. Using semver as the main argument to not remove a feature that has been deprecated for 7 years is silly. Let’s have a major release! 2.0 by summer. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:38 AM Jacob Barrett

Re: [Discuss] Removal of Thread Local Connection Pooling

> On Apr 5, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > One question: if I’m using thread-local connections ho does that affect pool > sizing? Are thread-local connections included in the overall pool size or > accounted for separately? On the client side thread local pool just pulls from

Re: [Discuss] Removal of Thread Local Connection Pooling

Well articulated and a wise decision; Jake. +1 On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anthony Baker wrote: > One question: if I’m using thread-local connections ho does that affect > pool sizing? Are thread-local connections included in the overall pool > size or accounted for separately? > > We may

Re: [Geode Build] Are the idea and eclipse plugins being used by anyone?

+1 to removing the idea plugin and the eclipse plugin as well. There is an eclipse plugin that lets you import gradle projects similar to the intellij one. I think that is what our eclipse developers are using now. I still think the intellij

Re: [Geode Build] Are the idea and eclipse plugins being used by anyone?

@upthewaterspout The plugin generates .iml, .ipr files used by old versions of IntelliJ. The plugin does not give a way to create or modify the currently-used XML files that live inside of the /.idea directory. +1 to removal of the idea plugin. On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 3:22 PM Dan Smith wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move or remove org.apache.geode.admin

I figured I’d take this discussion up with the experts and founding fathers. ;) https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/508 -jake > On Apr 4, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Let’s separate the discussion into these parts: > > - What does SemVer say and how do we apply it > - When

Re: [Discuss] Removal of Thread Local Connection Pooling

One question: if I’m using thread-local connections ho does that affect pool sizing? Are thread-local connections included in the overall pool size or accounted for separately? We may want some explicit release notes if a user would need to resize their pools during an upgrade. Anthony >

[Discuss] Removal of Thread Local Connection Pooling

Devs, The current connection pooling implementation contains a setting that enables a secondary pool that is thread local. See ClientCacheFactory. setPoolThreadLocalConnections method for details. This thread local pooling was added to reduce contention on the primary connection pool under