Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.10.0

Congrats!!! Nice work! On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 2:08 PM Dick Cavender wrote: > The Apache Geode community is pleased to announce the availability of > Apache Geode 1.10.0. > > Apache Geode is a data management platform that provides a database-like > consistency model, reliable transaction

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode 1.11.0 dependency update

Hi Dick- Thanks for the reminder on an important topic. On quick review of *Nick's* proposal, which I like (well done), I would only add that if a patch release is cut (e.g. 1.9.1, 1.9.2) that dependencies be reviewed for updated patch releases as well. While different patch versions of

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode 1.11.0 dependency update

Yes please! > On Sep 26, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Dick Cavender wrote: > > With the release of Geode 1.10.0 the window opens to apply Nick's Geode > dependency update process with time to shake it out before the 1.11.0 > release. > > His proposal can be found here: >

[DISCUSS] Geode 1.11.0 dependency update

With the release of Geode 1.10.0 the window opens to apply Nick's Geode dependency update process with time to shake it out before the 1.11.0 release. His proposal can be found here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/%5BDiscussion%5D+Geode+dependency+update+process Additionally

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.10.0

The Apache Geode community is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Geode 1.10.0. Apache Geode is a data management platform that provides a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance with

ssl configuration parameters

Hi geode dev, We would need to clarify the meaning of some ssl configuration parameters. When the flag “ssl-enabled-components” is set to “cluster”, our understanding is that this means geode would enforce SSL only between members of the same distributedSystem (same site). This would imply that

Errored: apache/geode-examples#368 (release/1.10.0 - 0d92c4a)

Build Update for apache/geode-examples - Build: #368 Status: Errored Duration: 32 secs Commit: 0d92c4a (release/1.10.0) Author: Dick Cavender Message: Revert "temporarily point to staging repo for CI purposes" View the changeset:

Re: [DISCUSS] Logging module separation

It is so great to see all the modules finally spinning out. Make it so!! -Jake > On Sep 26, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Ernest Burghardt wrote: > > Dear Geode, > > In support of the Membership >

Re: [DISCUSS] Logging module separation

Sorry Anil. Maybe this will work - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/cRLABw -Dan

Re: [DISCUSS] Logging module separation

Dan, Some reason, cant view the diagram...It doesn't show up... On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:52 AM Dan Smith wrote: > If you are wondering how this relates to the geode-log4j work that Kirk > did, the following diagram might help. Basically, he made a geode-log4j > module that makes log4j-core

Re: [DISCUSS] Logging module separation

If you are wondering how this relates to the geode-log4j work that Kirk did, the following diagram might help. Basically, he made a geode-log4j module that makes log4j-core optional. This geode-logging module allows the use of some of our log4j wrapper classes from modules other than geode-core.

[DISCUSS] Logging module separation

Dear Geode, In support of the Membership modularization efforts, we would like to move some of our logging code that wraps log4j into a separate module is needed in order to break

Re: dockerhub mojo

Dick, you should have access now. On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:38 AM Dick Cavender wrote: > Can someone with the ability give my docker hub account (docdixie) > permissions to upload the new geode 1.10.0 docker image? > > Thanks! >

dockerhub mojo

Can someone with the ability give my docker hub account (docdixie) permissions to upload the new geode 1.10.0 docker image? Thanks!

Re: Question about rolling back a Geode upgrade

Hi again, I have been investigating a bit more the possibility of supporting "rolling downgrades" in Geode similar to rolling upgrades and I would like to share my findings and also ask for some help. My tests were done upgrading from Geode 1.10 to a recent version in the develop branch and

Re: [DISCUSS] - Cutting of release 1.9.2

+1 for creating a 1.9.2 release with the fix. Cheers. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:47 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > It seems there is consensus to cut a 1.9.2 release to include GEODE-7121. > > --Udo > > On 9/20/19 3:34 PM, Jens Deppe wrote: > > +1 for creating a 1.9.2 release with this fix. > > > >