Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.2.RC1

2019-10-16 Thread Michael Oleske
+1 built and ran tests for native client on windows. -michael On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:21 PM Blake Bender wrote: > Okay I'm convinced we're okay, so switching to a +1. Standard PEBKAC error > here, I managed to produce a native client build which was missing the jar > file we use for a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.2.RC1

2019-10-16 Thread Jens Deppe
No worries and thanks for taking the time to look at the bits! --Jens On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:21 PM Blake Bender wrote: > Okay I'm convinced we're okay, so switching to a +1. Standard PEBKAC error > here, I managed to produce a native client build which was missing the jar > file we use for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.2.RC1

2019-10-16 Thread Blake Bender
Okay I'm convinced we're okay, so switching to a +1. Standard PEBKAC error here, I managed to produce a native client build which was missing the jar file we use for a whole bunch of tests, so all failed. Thanks, Blake On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 1:03 PM Blake Bender wrote: > I'm a -1 on this

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.9.2.RC1

2019-10-16 Thread Blake Bender
I'm a -1 on this one, for the time being, sorry. I ran native client integration tests against it on my dev workstation and am seeing an inordinate number of failures. It's gonna take me some time to understand what's going on, but I'll update everyone shortly as to whether I think we have a

Re: Question about rolling back a Geode upgrade

2019-10-16 Thread Alberto Gomez
Hi, Thanks for your suggestion, Anthony. I gave it a try and the rolling downgrade worked because peers are prepared to exchange messages in different versions by means of the toDataPre_GEODE_X_X_X_X() fromDataPre_GEODE_X_X_X_X mechanism. After all my investigation on this topic I have come to