Sometime around when we created a release branch for v1.11.0, and bumped
develop to v1.12.0, the semver resource stopped incrementing our SNAPSHOT
number.
The 1.11 main pipeline is stuck at 1.11.0 (the initial version) instead of
having continued on from 1.11.0-SNAPSHOT.303
The develop main
@Naba, Thank you for this.
I think we have identified quite a few PR's (I think we could name
around 5 ppl who have started this).
The intent is to align the versions with verified BOM versions. THAT
should hopefully help this exercise be simplified.
--Udo
On 11/7/19 3:37 PM, Nabarun Nag
Initial attempts have been made : https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4256
This PR has Maintainers edit permissions enabled.
We need to figure out a plan on these following springframework
dependencies too.
- spring-hateos [geode - 0.25.0 RELEASE latest 1.0.1 RELEASE]
- spring-plugin-core
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:28 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jens Deppe wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry,
> > >
> > > To clarify... When we change the Spring version we would be looking at
> > > looking
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jens Deppe wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
>
> > Sorry,
> >
> > To clarify... When we change the Spring version we would be looking at
> > looking to use the latest version and it's associated BOM.
> >
> > That might be
+1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> To clarify... When we change the Spring version we would be looking at
> looking to use the latest version and it's associated BOM.
>
> That might be inclusive of other Spring project upgrades.
>
> --Udo
>
> On 10/30/19 1:35
Thanks for the answer Jake, I have sent a PR with the changes. I already know
the plans to use concourse instead of travis in the Geode client, I have it in
mind, its a good opportunity to learn about concourse.
De: Jacob Barrett
Enviado: jueves, 7 de noviembre
Oh, I misunderstood option-1 and option-2. What I vote is Jason's option-1.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:19 AM Jason Huynh wrote:
> Gester, I don't think we need to write in the old format, we just need the
> new format not to be written while old members can potentially read the
> lucene files.
Gester, I don't think we need to write in the old format, we just need the
new format not to be written while old members can potentially read the
lucene files. Option 1 can be very similar to Dan's snippet of code.
I think Option 2 is going to leave a lot of people unhappy when they get
stuck
Based on the lack of “-1” votes, I have cherry-picked the change…
Thanks,
Mark
> On Nov 7, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
>
> The change passed in SSL benchmark testing and can be cherry-picked into the
> release branch. The Benchmark job as a whole failed due to perf degradation
+1 to include the fix
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:54 AM Bruce Schuchardt
wrote:
> The change passed in SSL benchmark testing and can be cherry-picked into
> the release branch. The Benchmark job as a whole failed due to perf
> degradation with the Security Manager, but that's a different set of
The change passed in SSL benchmark testing and can be cherry-picked into
the release branch. The Benchmark job as a whole failed due to perf
degradation with the Security Manager, but that's a different set of tests.
On 11/6/19 3:57 PM, Helena Bales wrote:
+1 to cherry-picking the fix.
The
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:38 AM Owen Nichols wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Some time ago I opened GEODE-7056 to update the Dockerfile of the
> > "geode-native-build", because I saw that it was using 1.6.0 although
>
> On Nov 7, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes
> wrote:
>
> Im curious about the geode-native integration tests. I have seen there are
> two kind of tests, depending on the framework they are based on. But no one
> of them are included in the CI executed by travis. Are they
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Some time ago I opened GEODE-7056 to update the Dockerfile of the
> "geode-native-build", because I saw that it was using 1.6.0 although 1.9.0
> was available. After this change, other ticket was needed to build and
Hi Geode community,
Im curious about the geode-native integration tests. I have seen there are two
kind of tests, depending on the framework they are based on. But no one of them
are included in the CI executed by travis. Are they executed only as part of
the Geode release process?
What is
Hi all,
Some time ago I opened GEODE-7056 to update the Dockerfile of the
"geode-native-build", because I saw that it was using 1.6.0 although 1.9.0 was
available. After this change, other ticket was needed to build and update the
image in Dockerhub.
I think this task (update file, build
Hi,
thanks for answers.
Some more details regarding 1st question.
Is this behavior same (for serial and parallel gateway sender) in case queue is
persistent?
Meaning, should queue (persistent) be purged if we restart gateway sender?
Thanks,
Mario
Šalje: Dan
18 matches
Mail list logo
