Re: [PROPOSAL] include GEODE-8055 in support/1.13

2020-05-04 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 8:28 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > Hi Jinmei, it looks like your commit came in just minutes after the > support/1.13 branch was cut, but before the email announcing the branch cut > was sent. +1 from me to go ahead and bring to support/1.13 on that basis. > > > On May 4,

Re: [PROPOSAL] include GEODE-8055 in support/1.13

2020-05-04 Thread Owen Nichols
Hi Jinmei, it looks like your commit came in just minutes after the support/1.13 branch was cut, but before the email announcing the branch cut was sent. +1 from me to go ahead and bring to support/1.13 on that basis. > On May 4, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > > Yes, there is a user

Re: [PROPOSAL] include GEODE-8055 in support/1.13

2020-05-04 Thread Jinmei Liao
Yes, there is a user request to reinstate this feature. On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:41 PM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > Since this issue is introduced from 1.7; meaning its present from 1.7 time, > can it be added in the next release, is there any strong user/customer > requirement to get this in

Re: [PROPOSAL] include GEODE-8055 in support/1.13

2020-05-04 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
Since this issue is introduced from 1.7; meaning its present from 1.7 time, can it be added in the next release, is there any strong user/customer requirement to get this in 1.13. -Anil. On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:55 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > I would like to include the fix for GEODE-8055 in the

Passed: apache/geode-native#2406 (support/1.13 - e620cea)

2020-05-04 Thread Travis CI
Build Update for apache/geode-native - Build: #2406 Status: Passed Duration: 1 hr, 22 mins, and 54 secs Commit: e620cea (support/1.13) Author: David Barnes Message: Bumping copyright year to 2020 View the changeset:

Passed: apache/geode-examples#445 (support/1.13 - c12bf27)

2020-05-04 Thread Travis CI
Build Update for apache/geode-examples - Build: #445 Status: Passed Duration: 24 mins and 11 secs Commit: c12bf27 (support/1.13) Author: David Barnes Message: Bumping copyright year to 2020 View the changeset:

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

2020-05-04 Thread Anthony Baker
We may be able to use the account from the ApacheGeode YouTube channel. If not, I would suggest creating a google account whose creds are managed by the PMC. Anthony > On May 4, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Alexander Murmann wrote: > > Seems like nobody has objections to adding this. > > Google

Re: Update of SSLParameterExtension interface

2020-05-04 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
I guess that would have to go into the 1.13 branch as well. This changes the public API but I think we should do it. The current API isn't usable since it refers to a non-public interface. On 5/4/20, 9:31 AM, "Mario Ivanac" wrote: Hi all, after comments that

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website

2020-05-04 Thread Alexander Murmann
Seems like nobody has objections to adding this. Google Analytics requires a Google account. Does is work if I create this with my own Google account and add anyone interested or is there a better solution? @Charlie: Yes, that would be great as well! On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:52 PM Charlie Black

Errored: apache/geode-examples#446 (develop - 47f98c5)

2020-05-04 Thread Travis CI
Build Update for apache/geode-examples - Build: #446 Status: Errored Duration: 1 min and 12 secs Commit: 47f98c5 (develop) Author: David Barnes Message: point develop examples to 1.14-SNAPSHOT now that support/1.13 has been created View the changeset:

[PROPOSAL] include GEODE-8055 in support/1.13

2020-05-04 Thread Jinmei Liao
I would like to include the fix for GEODE-8055 in the 1.13 branch. This would allow users to use gfsh to create an index on sub regions. -- Cheers Jinmei

Geode support/1.13 created

2020-05-04 Thread Dave Barnes
We have created a new support branch for Apache Geode 1.13.0 - support/1.13. We hope to make a final release in about a month. Please focus your acceptance testing on this branch and raise any concerns in the next few weeks. After some quiet period, we will package a release candidate and present

Update of SSLParameterExtension interface

2020-05-04 Thread Mario Ivanac
Hi all, after comments that SSLParameterExtension interface has an init() method that takes a DistributionConfig as an argument (which is internal class), new solution is proposed to replace DistributionConfig with Properties. New PR is created with new proposal