Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1

2021-03-11 Thread Dave Barnes
+1 docs: - Binary distribution contains javadocs with correctly-versioned header (1.13.2). - Source distribution contains user guide sources that build successfully and are correctly versioned. (did not test geode-native source) On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 1:45 PM Donal Evans wrote: > +1 > >

Re: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1

2021-03-11 Thread Donal Evans
+1 Confirmed that performance across a broad range of workloads is comparable to that seen in the 1.13.1 release. From: Dick Cavender Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:34 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Suspected Spam] [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1 Hello

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.13.2.RC1

2021-03-11 Thread Dick Cavender
Hello Geode Dev Community, It's been 4 months since the Apache Geode 1.13.1 release and there are a total 48 important fixes on support/1.13 that the community would benefit from. The recently released v1.12.1 has 33

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Owen Nichols
Sounds good, added to blocker board. On 3/11/21, 12:02 PM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote: +1 Get Outlook for

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Nabarun Nag
+1 Get Outlook for iOS From: Anilkumar Gingade Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:59:17 AM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 +1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "Jianxia Chen"

Re: [Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Anilkumar Gingade
+1 to backport. On 3/11/21, 11:38 AM, "Jianxia Chen" wrote: Hi, I would like to backport the fix of GEODE-9016 to Geode 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 branches. This would help resolve the NPE for certain cases of PutAll with CQ. Thanks, Jianxia

[Proposal] Backport GEODE-9016 to 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12

2021-03-11 Thread Jianxia Chen
Hi, I would like to backport the fix of GEODE-9016 to Geode 1.14, 1.13 and 1.12 branches. This would help resolve the NPE for certain cases of PutAll with CQ. Thanks, Jianxia

Re: [Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch

2021-03-11 Thread Owen Nichols
Now is definitely the time to fix this. Glad to have this added to blocker board. On 3/11/21, 11:09 AM, "Jens Deppe" wrote: +1 On 3/11/21, 10:49 AM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote: Hi everyone, Putting forward the proposal to backport GEODE-9091 (Serialization Improvements)

Re: [Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch

2021-03-11 Thread Jens Deppe
+1 On 3/11/21, 10:49 AM, "Nabarun Nag" wrote: Hi everyone, Putting forward the proposal to backport GEODE-9091 (Serialization Improvements) to support/1.14 branch, What does GEODE-9091 do? * It adds serialVersionUID to the Serializable classes in geode-redis module

Re: [Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch

2021-03-11 Thread Sarah Abbey
+1 From: Nabarun Nag Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 1:48 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: [Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch Hi everyone, Putting forward the proposal to backport GEODE-9091 (Serialization Improvements) to

[Poposal] Backport GEODE-9019 to Apache Geode 1.14.0 branch

2021-03-11 Thread Nabarun Nag
Hi everyone, Putting forward the proposal to backport GEODE-9091 (Serialization Improvements) to support/1.14 branch, What does GEODE-9091 do? * It adds serialVersionUID to the Serializable classes in geode-redis module * It converts all DataSerializable classes to