Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

Some apache projects have a "sandbox" repo or module. - Eg https://github.com/apache/solr-sandbox orhttps://commons.apache.org/sandbox.html -Dan From: Charlie Black Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 12:14 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removal o

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

+ 1 to additional repos for extensions to Geode project to keep "extensions" or bolt-ons out of the Apache Geode. I also have extensions that aren't committed to Geode.So definably a vibrant community surrounding Geode. What todo with the code: Just link to the branch/sha/fork/first a

Fixed: apache/geode-native#3070 (master - d4ca2b9)

Build Update for apache/geode-native - Build: #3070 Status: Fixed Duration: 1 hr, 17 mins, and 52 secs Commit: d4ca2b9 (master) Author: Dick Cavender Message: Replacing master with contents of rel/v1.13.2 View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/geode-na

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

How hard is it to put the work like Protobuf in a separate repository (attached to Geode in some way)? I am not sure what the (Apache) procedure is. We need stop baking everything into the "core" of Apache Geode. Most things that are non-essential (meaning, they are not required for Geode to ca

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

That's true John, but the Protobuf i/f is using the same code as the REST server to serialize/deserialize JSON documents. It isn't any better at it. On 3/29/21, 10:33 AM, "John Blum" wrote: Correction! Although a different/separate issue, Geode's JSON document handling is incomplete at b

Passed: apache/geode-native#3067 (rel/v1.13.2 - 85b6261)

Build Update for apache/geode-native - Build: #3067 Status: Passed Duration: 1 hr, 15 mins, and 9 secs Commit: 85b6261 (rel/v1.13.2) Author: Dick Cavender Message: Bumping copyright year to 2021 View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/geode-native/compar

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

+1 to "removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface" If someone offers to take on the completion of the "experimental Protobuf client/server interface" in a timely manner, then I would say hold off on removing. As for the other removal items that were brought up. Please rai

Re: Very old geode-native PRs

Hi @Blake Bender, Thanks for taking some time on clearing out old PRs. I'll progress #699, so it can be closed ASAP. BR, Mario. From: Blake Bender Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 8:24 PM To: dev@geode.apache.org Subject: Very old geode-na

Very old geode-native PRs

Good morning! We are attempting to push through all of the most longstanding geode-native PRs, so if you're involved in one as an author or a reviewer your prompt attention would be much appreciated. There are 4 outstanding that I consider "very old," all initially submitted prior to the first

Passed: apache/geode-examples#533 (rel/v1.13.2 - f52ac92)

Build Update for apache/geode-examples - Build: #533 Status: Passed Duration: 23 mins and 28 secs Commit: f52ac92 (rel/v1.13.2) Author: Dick Cavender Message: Bumping version to 1.13.2 View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/compare/rel/v1

Re: [DISCUSS] removal of experimental Protobuf client/server interface

Correction! Although a different/separate issue, Geode's JSON document handling is incomplete at best. It does not properly handle all forms of JSON or types (e.g. Java 8 Data/Time types). From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:01 AM To: dev@geod