+1
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 12:52 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Move geode to the attic
⚠ External Email
Hi folks,
Last week we discussed moving Geode to the attic [1]. I'm sad to find us at
this point. But given that we will
+!
From: Raymond Ingles
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 4:18 PM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: Cutting 1.15 Release branch Tuesday, 25 January
Hello Geode Dev Community,
We have a proposal to cut the 1.15 release branch this coming Tuesday, the 25th
of January, 2022. At this
:/Users/bblake/ path!
-Dan
From: Ernie Burghardt
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 10:33 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Re: testing Geode Net Core
Hi Rupert,
We are very early in development of net-core, I would watch for a future
release or monitor the pull
Hi Rupert,
We are very early in development of net-core, I would watch for a future
release or monitor the pull requests as features are added…
Best,
Ernie
From: Rupert St John Webster
Date: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 8:25 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: testing Geode Net Core
Hi,
What are we missing/unable to format with our clang-tools?
These style discussions tend to become holy wars, hopefully we can avoid this...
if we can tool are largest concerns and perform good PR reviews looking for
valid algorithms, good mnemonics naming variables and such I think we'll be
The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Kamilla Aslami to
join the Geode as a Committer and we are pleased to announce she has
accepted.
Please join me in welcoming Kamilla!
Best regards,
EB
On behalf of the Apache Geode PMC
Hello Geode,
The fix for GEODE-9000 (NPE during Network Partition) is being applied to
develop and is needed in 1.14 as well.
I propose backporting this fix.
Thanks,
EB
I would like to include the change for GEODE-8919 to 1.14.0, it is a valuable
and low risk change.
Thanks,
EB
Aka different versions of clang-format are not compatible in a sense... also,
watch out for non-standard clang-format versions that may come with certain
IDEs...
On 2/25/21, 9:04 AM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
Hey Geode Native devs,
You may have noticed this new CI that looks a lot
Its not just you Bruce, I get this...
2021-02-24 13:38:10,891 main ERROR Error processing element GeodeConsole
([Appenders: null]): CLASS_NOT_FOUND
2021-02-24 13:38:10,898 main ERROR Error processing element GeodeLogWriter
([Appenders: null]): CLASS_NOT_FOUND
2021-02-24 13:38:10,898 main ERROR
Perfect, then let's give this a try.
+1
On 11/19/20, 10:45 AM, "Robert Houghton" wrote:
Hi Ernie,
DRAFT PRs do not get reviewers by default, but when the draft transitions
to ‘ready’, then the owners are requested to review.
From: Ernie Burghardt
Date: Thursday
Does GitHub allow us to limit this automated action to non-DRAFT PRs?
On 11/18/20, 8:28 PM, "Owen Nichols" wrote:
+1 This will greatly improve the experience for contributors. Instead of
an intimidating empty list of reviewers when you submit a PR (and no ability to
add reviewers, if
Hi Jakov,
I'm looking into your question(s)... curious if you've run into this in a
non-k8s cluster?
Might help focus the investigation...
Thanks,
EB
On 10/13/20, 7:51 AM, "Jakov Varenina" wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for bothering, but we have noticed some differences in behavior
Alberto B.
____
De: Ernie Burghardt
Enviado: jueves, 17 de septiembre de 2020 22:08
Para: dev@geode.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Clean C++ client metadata in timeouts
Let's please consider how this would controlled and look for ways other
than YetAnotherProperty
Than
Let's please consider how this would controlled and look for ways other than
YetAnotherProperty
Thanks,
EB
On 9/17/20, 12:59 PM, "Dave Barnes" wrote:
If a straight-up change solves a constant headache, as you suggest,
Alberto, and as Blake concurs, that sounds like the way to go.
+1
On 6/26/20, 7:51 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
This small fix avoids a failure of one cluster to communicate with the
locators of another cluster, ensuring that a proper handshake for WAN
communications occurs. Without the fix it’s possible that WAN connections will
not be formed
+100
On 6/18/20, 10:46 AM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
Several keystores used by a test have expired, which will cause acceptance
tests to fail in support/1.13. I’d like to cherry-pick the new keystores into
that branch. The new keystores have a 5/2120 expiration date.
Hi Alberto,
I’m looking at this, came across a couple blockers…
Do you have branch that exhibits this problem? Draft PR maybe?
I tried to apply you patch to latest develop, but the patch doesn’t pass git
apply’s check….
Also these tests pass on develop, would you be able to check against the
I'm a fan of features on forks! It's fairly simple to make forks accessible to
other folks.
I know this isn't a vote, but I'm a +1 for the concept...
EB
On 6/2/20, 3:42 PM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote:
I know this has been brought up multiple times without resolution. I want
us resolve to
+1
On 5/27/20, 1:35 PM, "Bruce Schuchardt" wrote:
This ticket has two PRs. One passed all normal CI runs but then we hit a
faulty test that failed on a Windows machine. There’s a new PR that fixes that
test & has been merged.
The PRs fixe endpoint verification problems in servers
20 matches
Mail list logo
